I didn't say his defence had improved and I wasn't insuiating that he was a good defender. I think he is the biggest liability in the NRL today.
.
According to RLW stats - Sandow has only missed 2 tackles more than Thurston - and he is a bloody future immortal.
what is this "tl;dr" stuff?
'tl;dr' ;-)Too long; didn't read
It is for when merkins like myself or Poups go on long rants, rife with tangents and waffling aplenty. You provide a few lines, the 'tl;dr', about what the gist of your mammoth read is about for the people that don't want to read all of it.
Too long; didn't read
It is for when merkins like myself or Poups go on long rants, rife with tangents and waffling aplenty. You provide a few lines, the 'tl;dr', about what the gist of your mammoth read is about for the people that don't want to read all of it.
Too long; didn't read
It is for when merkins like myself or Poups go on long rants, rife with tangents and waffling aplenty. You provide a few lines, the 'tl;dr', about what the gist of your mammoth read is about for the people that don't want to read all of it.
'tl;dr' ;-)
Yep. It's Gen Y for 'executive summary'.
I'd keep Sandow, still the best half back we have had since Jason Taylor.
Tim Smith was mate. He had two amazing seasons for us 2005 and 2007. He also steered us to the semi finals. Sandow on the other hand is still in the dream phase.
The only good thing about Chris is when he got $$$$$$$$$$$$ on himself to kick 40 /20
Yes, Tim Smith who played in multiple finals series matches in his under 100 match NRL career.
Chris Sandow on the other hand has yet to experience that from his 150odd game NRL career.
Is it time to create a new bring back Tim Smith thread?