There is a cap on Third party sponsors organised by the club.
How is it proved who it's organised by
The idea for the salary cap should be to prevent clubs from going broke.
A more even competition is just a by product.
3rd party deals don't make or break a club.
Some of the people here want to end up like the epl
They just make or break that clubs ability to sign/re-sign players.
They just make or break that clubs ability to sign/re-sign players.
And the Sharks didn't need to pay big for other teams juniors like Lewis and Gordon.
If you spent your cap more wisely and prioritised right you'd have kept better talent like Fifita and Lichaa
No they don't, and as long as clubs with small mentalities keep believing that they'll keep on being small clubs e.g. Fifita didn't leave the sharks because he got more at the dogs. He left because the sharks are rudderless and have no direction at any level.
Its generally when it is a club sponsor also paying the player seperately for advertising purposes.
Like when Slater was in those Suzuki ads, whilst suzuki was also our sleeve sponsor.
Some of the people here want to end up like the epl
The ANZ deal however is bullshit, as if that's not a conflict of interest
Better than turning it in to NSW Cup because clubs can't keep star players in the game
Why should successful clubs be punished because shit teams like Wests can't organise 3rd party deals?