strong_latte
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,665
Anyway all this talk of league fans in love with NFL is making me sick, go watch the padded twinkies if you like, I'll stick with the real mens games, Rugby League and Rugby Union.
go watch the padded twinkies
strong_latte said:The Rugby World Cup was watched by more people in more country's around the world than the super bowl mate. It was Ranked the 3 biggest sporting event in the world after the Soccer and Olympics.
It was Ranked the 3 biggest sporting event in the world after the Soccer and Olympics.
strong_latte said:Yeah? And where the f**k have your sources been all this time???? I don't recall any!
To quote a moron: "your words mean nothing"
Good night.
England’s triumph over Australia was watched by a live global audience of about 25 million people, a report stated yesterday. Initiative, the world’s largest communications agency, which collates viewing figures, said that 22 million people in the British Isles, France, Italy, Romania, Australia, New Zealand and Argentina saw the whole of the game. This included an audience of 12.3 million in Britain, a figure that rose to 14.5 million at the end.
Having watched a bit of the Rugby World Cup, and read a little bit about it, I've reached the conclusion (not an original one) that the structure is radically defective. Most of the games I've seen so far have had all the tension of the annual grudge match between the Brisbane Lions and the Toowong Under 12s (Reserves). There are only half a dozen teams that are serious contenders,and, as I understand it, the pool + elimination final setup means most of them will never play each other. Meanwhile, we get to watch game after game with scorelines like 300 to minus 10.
What's needed here is two top pools of four (the finalists from the previous cup) with the bottom team in each pool eliminated after the pool matches, and two second division pools with the top qualifiers making it through to the finals. This would mean that most of the interesting matches would actually be played.
Then there's the estimate that 4 billion people will watch the Cup. Those who've seen such statistics in the past know that this is calculated by counting the same people over and over again as they watch different matches. Even so, there are no more than 40 games scheduled, implying an average audience of 100 million. The only hard number I've seen is the Australian audience for Australia's first game, against Argentina, which was about 2 million. Let's be very generous and suppose that the same number of people watched in Argentina (a soccer-mad country where rubgy is the pastime of a tiny minority). That still leaves us short 96 million - presumably these are people who are passionate enough about rugby to watch a game in which they have no direct interest. Where in the world are that many rugby fans going to be found? The New Zealanders, Pacific Islanders and the Welsh are pretty keen, as are white South Africans, but that's only about ten million people altogether. Rugby is a significant minority sport in the rest of the British Isles and in France and you might get another ten million potential viewers there. The US and Japan may have teams here, but I doubt that the average American or Japanese is even aware that the Cup is being played.
To sum up, if you supposed that the entire rugby-following population of the world, men, women and children, all watched every match, you might get something approaching a billion viewers in total. I'd guess, though, that a realistic estimate is closer to 100 million.
Posted by jquiggin at October 26, 2003 04:15 PM | TrackBack
Comments
Well called John. The union world cup opening cermony had a total world audience of 10 million. The final has a world audience of 22 million & ignoring the viewers in the country who played in the final about 3 to 4 million watched the this game.
Argentina's average viewing audience for each RUWC game averaged 19,000. (These figures were from an article in the London Times (Online edition-19 December 2003)who quoted Initiative a company that tracks these world wide audiences.)
The question has to be asked how did they get away with it?
Posted
russ13 said:On the RUWC final TV audience here is a reference
England’s triumph over Australia was watched by a live global audience of about 25 million people, a report stated yesterday. Initiative, the world’s largest communications agency, which collates viewing figures, said that 22 million people in the British Isles, France, Italy, Romania, Australia, New Zealand and Argentina saw the whole of the game. This included an audience of 12.3 million in Britain, a figure that rose to 14.5 million at the end.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,7995-912529,00.html
strong latte said:The Rugby World Cup was watched by more people in more country's around the world than the super bowl mate. It was Ranked the 3 biggest sporting event in the world after the Soccer and Olympics.
Everlovin' Antichrist said:russ13 said:On the RUWC final TV audience here is a reference
Englands triumph over Australia was watched by a live global audience of about 25 million people, a report stated yesterday. Initiative, the worlds largest communications agency, which collates viewing figures, said that 22 million people in the British Isles, France, Italy, Romania, Australia, New Zealand and Argentina saw the whole of the game. This included an audience of 12.3 million in Britain, a figure that rose to 14.5 million at the end.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,7995-912529,00.html
Thanks for the info Russ.
strong latte said:The Rugby World Cup was watched by more people in more country's around the world than the super bowl mate. It was Ranked the 3 biggest sporting event in the world after the Soccer and Olympics.
LOL
Super Bowl XXXVII TV audience: Last year's game was the most watched program ever with 138.9 million viewers. The 10 most-watched programs in TV history are all Super Bowls.
http://www.superbowl.com/features/general_info
The 2002 FIFA World Cup Korea/Japan recorded total viewing figures in excess of 28.8 billion, while the final itself between Brazil and Germany in Yokohama attracted in excess of 1.1 billion - the largest TV audience in footballing history.
strong latte said:138.9 million viewers is absolutely nothing
JW said:strong latte said:138.9 million viewers is absolutely nothing
It is compared to the 25 odd million for the Rugby Union WC which you claim to be the 3rd biggest sporting event on the planet.
#-o #-o #-o #-o
Cheers.
simostorm said:This topic again, what a joke.
Both games are shithouse!
strong_latte said:simostorm said:This topic again, what a joke.
Both games are shithouse!
If you thought that, then why come here?
In-goal said:I personaly would have thought the 3 largest sporting events in order would be:
1. FIFA World Cup
2. Olympic Games (Summer)
3. Cricket World Cup (Due only to the sub continent were 1.5 Billion Live)
All sports are small in comparison to football, Rugby League can't compete with football but it can live along side it.
strong_latte said:JW said:strong latte said:138.9 million viewers is absolutely nothing
It is compared to the 25 odd million for the Rugby Union WC which you claim to be the 3rd biggest sporting event on the planet.
#-o #-o #-o #-o
Cheers.
I read different figures on that, I heard it was 240 mil!
Anyway the fact remains he tried to say the last 10 super bowls were the biggest rating programs in TV history!
WELL! Apparently the BILLION PEOPLE who watched the Fifa World Cup final disagreed with that! #-o #-o #-o #-o
Tighthead said:Why is it that you won't take (justifiably) the ARU's word for it on TV ratings, but you are happy to provide a cite from the official superbowl website?
(ETA) I don't doubt the figures provided by the site, I just think that it's a bit intellectually dishonest.