They weren't favourites because they were lucky to beat the Sharks who shit the bed and imo should have won. They were also 1 win from their last 6 in the regular season so I don't understand how that qualifies as "coming into the finals with momentum". They barely clung on to 8th spot FFS!
Well that would explain why merkins underestimated them, including you and me.
Parra on the other hand won 5 of their last 6 going into the finals (including their last 3). They also played exceptionally well in the first week and nearly beat the benchmark side in a much higher quality contest.
I expected us to win that game against the Cowboys and I think the Cowboys deserved to be underdogs based on what they had served up beforehand.
I expected us to win too, but hindsight (where we are now judging whether or not Parra should have won that game) shows us the Cowboys also beat the Roosters and went on the make the grand final. But even at the time they had a superior 17 players against us on game day. That's what we should've been looking at, rather than the players that were missing. We should all have learnt our lesson from that game.
Big game experience (finals plus Origin):
Coote (9 games)
Feldt (10 games)
O'Neill (16 games)
Linnett (15 games)
Winterstein (14 games)
Martin (1 game)
Morgan (20 games)
Bolton (14 games)
Granville (8 games)
Taumalolo (13 games)
Cooper (19 games)
Lowe (7 games)
Fensom (5 games)
Asiata (7 games)
Hampton (3 games)
Hess (6 games)
Jensen (1 game)
That's a combined 168 games worth of Origin plus finals. The only bloke playing in his first ever finals series was Corey Jensen. By comparison we had 85 games (30 provided by one player) including 10 players in their first ever finals series:
Smith (3 games)
Radradra (1 game)
Jennings (30 games)
Takairangi (1 game)
Auva'a (5 games)
Norman (2 games)
Moses (1 game)
Alvaro (1 game)
King (1 game)
Mannah (9 games)
Ma'u (1 game)
Edwards (1 game)
Brown (1 game)
Scott (24 games)
Matagi (4 games)
Pritchard (0 games)
Terepo (0 games)
I reckon this doesn't just point to a lack of experience but a lack of quality.