What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Do you want Brad Arthur as coach

Do you want Brad Arthur as coach

  • Yes

    Votes: 109 48.0%
  • No

    Votes: 118 52.0%

  • Total voters
    227

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,412
Remember when our sponsor wanted Kearney? That worked out well
So f**k the sponsors ? You seem to have a short memory and forget the days when we stunk so bad we had Parra Leagues on the front of the jersey.
 

Noise

Coach
Messages
18,149
So f**k the sponsors ? You seem to have a short memory and forget the days when we stunk so bad we had Parra Leagues on the front of the jersey.
You have no evidence that our sponsors would leave if we sign Flanagan. You have just made it up as another reason why we should stick with BA.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,412
You have no evidence that our sponsors would leave if we sign Flanagan. You have just made it up as another reason why we should stick with BA.
LMAO you guys trying to wedge everyone into adopting your "sack him now" position. I've stated my position many times this morning and it's not what you are alleging.
 

hybrideel

Bench
Messages
4,101
Webster just mentioned on SEN, there is plenty of safeguards in BA’s contract to “let” him go (not large pay out). He spoke to “parra” people during the week.
Could also explain his manager shopping him around, maybe he has watched our games this year and sees the writing on the wall
 

Joshuatheeel

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,157
You have no evidence that our sponsors would leave if we sign Flanagan. You have just made it up as another reason why we should stick with BA.
It’s not a reason to keep BA just a reason why Flanagan may not be an option and why tigers/warrior/dogs never considered him.
 

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
62,867
Anyone who still wants Arthur as coach isn't a fan of the club it's as simple as that.

We just need some luck. Like you know. If the other team has 4 or 5 injuries the week before and lose two or three guys during the game.
We are a red hot chance mate. Don't give up yet.
 

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
62,867
I'd change my vote if there an option which allowed me to replace him with a coach with a proven track record. I'm against sacking for the sake of sacking. That's always been my position because it can send you backwards.

Oh are you saying you where wrong?
f**king rabbit.
 

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
62,867
So it's OK to go further backwards ? I don't get your point.

You guys have short memories when we signed Big Face, Broncos signed Seibold, Tits signed Holbrook, Knights signed O'Brien, Dogs signed Barrett. Changing the coach does not bring automatic improvement and you can easily go backwards. I even thought that signing Ricky Stuart would instantly turn us into a powerhouse. FMD let's not even talk about the Cronin Hilditch years.

Change the coach by all means, but I'm against sacking Tigers / Bulldogs style and then working it out later. Get a good guy lined up, sign him and then pay the other guy out. That's the way to do it when you can afford it.


Justification that @TheRam and Hindy111 along with others where right and you got it completely wrong.
☺️
 

Noise

Coach
Messages
18,149
Sure is... although even if he leaves today, it doesnt make the bet payable.
He could coach us to a GF in 25 years time and you would then owe me.
Don't be a tight arse. It's embarrassing. You made a bet. If he leaves before making a gf you lose. If he makes one before he leaves, I lose. Honour it.
 

hineyrulz

Post Whore
Messages
153,447
Sure is... although even if he leaves today, it doesnt make the bet payable.
He could coach us to a GF in 25 years time and you would then owe me.
Kermit GIF
 
Top