Noise
Coach
- Messages
- 18,149
Remember when our sponsor wanted Kearney? That worked out wellDo sponsors want him ? Not if they think it impacts their brand.
Remember when our sponsor wanted Kearney? That worked out wellDo sponsors want him ? Not if they think it impacts their brand.
We were 4th and now 6th, just in one dayWe are already going backwards.
So f**k the sponsors ? You seem to have a short memory and forget the days when we stunk so bad we had Parra Leagues on the front of the jersey.Remember when our sponsor wanted Kearney? That worked out well
You have no evidence that our sponsors would leave if we sign Flanagan. You have just made it up as another reason why we should stick with BA.So f**k the sponsors ? You seem to have a short memory and forget the days when we stunk so bad we had Parra Leagues on the front of the jersey.
LMAO you guys trying to wedge everyone into adopting your "sack him now" position. I've stated my position many times this morning and it's not what you are alleging.You have no evidence that our sponsors would leave if we sign Flanagan. You have just made it up as another reason why we should stick with BA.
Could also explain his manager shopping him around, maybe he has watched our games this year and sees the writing on the wallWebster just mentioned on SEN, there is plenty of safeguards in BA’s contract to “let” him go (not large pay out). He spoke to “parra” people during the week.
It’s not a reason to keep BA just a reason why Flanagan may not be an option and why tigers/warrior/dogs never considered him.You have no evidence that our sponsors would leave if we sign Flanagan. You have just made it up as another reason why we should stick with BA.
Sack now and wait for the inevitable half a dozen quality applications and choose the best one. We are not the Tigers or the Dogs.As I said sign first, sack later.
After last night, I still hate his f**ken guts but I’d go cap in hand to Bellamy firstSack now and wait for the inevitable half a dozen quality applications and choose the best one. We are not the Tigers or the Dogs.
Anyone who still wants Arthur as coach isn't a fan of the club it's as simple as that.
I'd change my vote if there an option which allowed me to replace him with a coach with a proven track record. I'm against sacking for the sake of sacking. That's always been my position because it can send you backwards.
So it's OK to go further backwards ? I don't get your point.
You guys have short memories when we signed Big Face, Broncos signed Seibold, Tits signed Holbrook, Knights signed O'Brien, Dogs signed Barrett. Changing the coach does not bring automatic improvement and you can easily go backwards. I even thought that signing Ricky Stuart would instantly turn us into a powerhouse. FMD let's not even talk about the Cronin Hilditch years.
Change the coach by all means, but I'm against sacking Tigers / Bulldogs style and then working it out later. Get a good guy lined up, sign him and then pay the other guy out. That's the way to do it when you can afford it.
Webster just mentioned on SEN, there is plenty of safeguards in BA’s contract to “let” him go (not large pay out). He spoke to “parra” people during the week.
Don't be a tight arse. It's embarrassing. You made a bet. If he leaves before making a gf you lose. If he makes one before he leaves, I lose. Honour it.Sure is... although even if he leaves today, it doesnt make the bet payable.
He could coach us to a GF in 25 years time and you would then owe me.
Sure is... although even if he leaves today, it doesnt make the bet payable.
He could coach us to a GF in 25 years time and you would then owe me.