Do you want Brad Arthur as coach

[I'm a loser baby...]

Most score less.

We were talking about contenders.

 

[oldmancraigy]

It's absolutely valid. You can't understand our lack of success without also understanding why some clubs are consistently strong while others are consistently weak. It can't be done with Parramattacentric lens, which is why you 'real fans' don't have an explanation that stands up to scrutiny. All you have is piss-taking. At least it makes you feel good.

Wow. So you legitimately just lumped me in as a piss taker?

Why did I bother trying to help you..... apologies. I'll go back into hiding.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

It's not about resource prioritisation. We got a new coach in to help the attack because the attack needed help.

If it was about fixing what needs fixing we would've gotten a defensive coach first. But you can only sign who's available.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Wow. So you legitimately just lumped me in as a piss taker?

Why did I bother trying to help you..... apologies. I'll go back into hiding.

lol good one smartarse

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

If it was about fixing what needs fixing we would've gotten a defensive coach first. But you can only sign who's available.

And if we do sign a defence coach?

 

[Poupou Escobar]

More coaching is better than less. If we can be 6th best attack and 8th best defence with our current coaching resources there's plenty of room to improve. Why wouldn't you try if you can afford it?

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

More coaching is better than less. If we can be 6th best attack and 8th best defence with our current coaching resources there's plenty of room to improve. Why wouldn't you try if you can afford it?

Huh?

 

[Gary Gutful]

Huh?

Lay off the sauce.

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

Lay off the sauce.

You're of the belief too that we hired an attack coach to help our defence?

 

[Gary Gutful]

You're of the belief too that we hired an attack coach to help our defence?

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Huh?

I think your confusion is that you see it as replacing a coach, whereas I see it as adding one. Basically the idea that our current coaches are wrong or bad, rather than just insufficient for competing with clubs that have more coaches. Our current coaching plus Barret is better than our current coaching without him, because it's an extra full time coach. Plus he has all that experience. The only reason not to hire him would be because we can't afford to.

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

I think your confusion is that you see it as replacing a coach, whereas I see it as adding one. Basically the idea that our current coaches are wrong or bad, rather than just insufficient for competing with clubs that have more coaches. Our current coaching plus Barret is better than our current coaching without him, because it's an extra full time coach. Plus he has all that experience. The only reason not to hire him would be because we can't afford to.

I do see it as adding one. To help the attack. I also suspect we'll add another one, to help the defence.

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

Soooooooooo....on the fence?

 

[Poupou Escobar]

I do see it as adding one. To help the attack. I also suspect we'll add another one, to help the defence.

Well we aren't first in either attack or defence so adding coaching can only help. Losing Kidwell certainly didn't help.

 

[Gary Gutful]

Soooooooooo....on the fence?

Huh?

 

[Gary Gutful]

...and no, I wont lay off the sauce!

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

Huh?

I don't know if you support Pou's argument that adding an attack coach is to help the defence.

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

...and no, I wont lay off the sauce!

I would never ask it.

 

[Gary Gutful]

I don't know if you support Pou's argument that adding an attack coach is to help the defence.

I think you need to find yourself an interptretron.

 

[Gary Gutful]

Here's one