What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

"Due for a loss" and other myths...

Godz Illa

Coach
Messages
18,745
The idea that a team can be "due for a loss" is a myth people, please dont get sucked in by it. I've seen it bandied around town alongside its equally unattractive cousin "with each win you are closer to a loss". Time for some Adam and Jamie style myth-busting - both of these concepts are bullsh*t. They are merely a lame rationalisations uttered strictly by losers. Note: they are usually prefixed by "We tried our best" - and to quote Sean Connery from The Rock: "losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and f*ck the prom queen." I want the prom queen this year - and I know that this year, she wants us too. Come to daddy baby.
 

Dragonheart

Juniors
Messages
435
1956 - Dragons go undefeated and take the premiership

1992 - Broncos only lose four games all season and take the premiership

There are more of these, but I don't have time to look them up while at work:)

EDIT: By the way Godz Illa....when your done with her, she's giving me a lap dance:lol:
 

drake

First Grade
Messages
5,433
I love that quote from the Rock. Looshers indeed.

Another thing I hate is when they talk about the "history" of a team over a long period against another team or at a certain ground.

What is the relevance of (for example) how the Dragons of 2000 did against the Eels of 2000? For the most part, they are different rosters, different staff etc.
What, does the Dragon totem have a problem with the Eel totem or some such drivel?
 

Willow

Assistant Moderator
Messages
109,914
St George, Souths, Easts and Balmain have all had undefeated seasons.

In 1955 Souths were running dead last half way through the year and looked set to take the wooden spoon. But they won every match from there on in to make the semis and win the premiership.

I'm sure they were considered one match closer to a loss as well.
 

Mr Saab

Referee
Messages
27,762
1989 : canberra won their last nine including the GF
1992 : Brisbane won their last nine including the GF (won 13/14 at the end)
2002 : Chooks won their last nine including the GF
 

Dragonheart

Juniors
Messages
435
Charlie Saab said:
1989 : canberra won their last nine including the GF
1992 : Brisbane won their last nine including the GF (won 13/14 at the end)
2002 : Chooks won their last nine including the GF

I guess our boys will have to go one better then, as the GF would make it 10 in a row:D
 

SpaceMonkey

Immortal
Messages
40,324
The Nulla #2 said:
sharks were due for a losss, and u guys beat us.

so i guess it works

ahahaha

The Sharks weren't "due for a loss" they lost because they played a better team. Simple.

"due for a loss" is like saying a roulette wheel is more likely to finish on red because the last ten spins have all been black. It's a fallacy, the result of the previous game in itself does not affect the probable outcome of the next.
 

Dragon_psa

First Grade
Messages
7,058
Dragonheart said:
1956 - Dragons go undefeated and take the premiership

Saints lost 4 games in '56 - Newtown round 5 (4-14), Balmain round 8 (11-22), Souths round 9 (6-28), and Wests round 16 (21-27), though we did take the title that year (the start of the golden run) against Balmain 18-12. Our undefeated season was 1959, with the only non victory being a 20 all draw against Balmain in round 11, going on to defeat Manly 20-0 in the big one.
 

Hutty1986

Immortal
Messages
34,034
The Nulla #2 said:
sharks were due for a losss, and u guys beat us.

so i guess it works

ahahaha

The Sharks have been "due for a loss" for about 39 years now and they've certainly lived up to expectation
 

gregstar

Referee
Messages
20,465
if we lose - we lose. law of averages doesn't apply.
if we're good enough, we'll win - simple
 

Latest posts

Top