Dump Yard

[DinkyDi]

Again with the attitude.

Where did I say you were fooled?

The author of the article is clearly fooled by the games and hence is the one person fooled

You wrote that comment, under mine, without any reference, so it could, and was, taken as shot at me.

 

[DinkyDi]

@DinkyDi
@Aliceinwonderland

I was referring to this post. The author being the one fooled

no idea why everything is such an issue with you two

Try using names next time, and that will avoid confusion, oh and you do not bother me either.

 

[Iamback]

You wrote that comment, under mine, without any reference, so it could, and was, taken as shot at me.

Because that was the post where the article was.

where was I meant to put it?

 

[DinkyDi]

Because that was the post where the article was.

where was I meant to put it?

Use the authors name, e.g. @Peterlang was fooled by this mind games. It is not rock science.

 

[Iamback]

Try using names next time, and that will avoid confusion, oh and you do not bother me either.

Generally if an article is posted without any comments. Then the replies are to the article not the poster

 

[Aliceinwonderland]

You wrote that comment, under mine, without any reference, so it could, and was, taken as shot at me.

It's funny Di, almost like a type of 'crazymaking' behaviour. I've had it happen to me.


Hmmmm. Says a lot doesn't it .

 

[Iamback]

Use the authors name, e.g. @Peterlang was fooled by this mind games. It is not rock science.

Yet 95% of people on this forum will see the reply for what it was

 

[DinkyDi]

Generally if an article is posted without any comments. Then the replies are to the article not the poster

I use the authors names, as a matter of respect.

 

[Iamback]

Sorry rest of the board. I should of used the ignore a while ago

 

[Aliceinwonderland]

@DinkyDi
@Aliceinwonderland

I was referring to this post. The author being the one fooled

no idea why everything is such an issue with you two

It's the patronising tone of what is written.

You appear to hunt down any posts or comments that Di and I make, and begin this type of behaviou.

Then when Di and I bring attention to it, you act all innocent like....with the 'who me'.

I use the authors names, as a matter of respect.

Exactly Di.

 

[DinkyDi]

It's the patronising tone of what is written.

You appear to hunt down any posts or comments that Di and I make, and begin this type of behaviou.

Then when Di and I bring attention to it, you act all innocent like....with the 'who me'.


Exactly Di.

@Iamback, will not admit that she, or he, is wrong.

 

[Iamback]

It's the patronising tone of what is written.

You appear to hunt down any posts or comments that Di and I make, and begin this type of behaviou.

Then when Di and I bring attention to it, you act all innocent like....with the 'who me'.


Exactly Di.

The rumoured thread. you jumped in on a convo. I didn't reply to a post of yours. So hunting a post is hard in that case

As for this.

An article is posted without comments.

How can the reply be for anyone but the author?

 

[DinkyDi]

The rumoured thread. you jumped in on a convo. I didn't reply to a post of yours. So hunting a post is hard in that case

As for this.

An article is posted without comments.

How can the reply be for anyone but the author?

Is this an act, or are you really lacking intelligence?

 

[DinkyDi]

Sorry rest of the board. I should of used the ignore a while ago

It is a pity that you did not apology to me. This would be over if you do.

 

[DinkyDi]

Was anyone fooled? I stilled tipped us and can prove it. I really live Peter as a journo and Panther fan but that's a stretch.

No, @WestyLife, I was not fooled.

 

[Aliceinwonderland]

It is a pity that you did not apology to me. This would be over if you do.

and to me.

 

[DinkyDi]

Yeah I can't remember who, maybe you it was hinted at in the pre season on this forum. I do a livestream each Tuesday with a Tigers fan and both of us picked Panthers.



Good thing no one suggested you were.

This thread is a bit weird with the animosity after @Iamback clarified what he meant.

It took him a while to do so, @WestyLife.

 

[WestyLife]

It took him a while to do so, @WestyLife.

Still should've been over at that point.

 

[DinkyDi]

Still should've been over at that point.

So you do not believe that I, and @Aliceinwonderland, deserves an apology?

 

[Aliceinwonderland]

So you do not believe that I, and @Aliceinwonderland, deserves an apology?

It amuses me (through gritted teeth) when others, especially blokes tell us little wimen how we should behaviour, and when we should get over being upset at being patronised, and put down.