Dougie said:
meltiger said:
Dougie said:
meltiger said:
Collingwoods hopes are going to rest on the tribunal tomorrow or Tuesday night, Rocca goes and they are no hope.
i wholeheartedly agree. If the tribunal is consistent, they will out Rocca for AT LEAST two weeks, should be more, his offence was worse than Fletcher's. If the tribunal cite the fact that it was a "Finals match" then im gunna be spewing. The tribunal set a precident with Fletch, and now they have to follow it.
lol
You really do think Fletch is incapable of doing something dirty don't you?
For mine the question is... Was the player hurt? The precedent was set last week when they basically said Lade would have been suspended if Hird got injured.......
No i dont think Fletch isnt capable of doing something dirty. What really pisses me off is the fact that it's a finals match FFS, its supposed to be tougher, more physical, with players putting their body on the line. But as soon as someone so much as sneezes in the wrong direction, (unless its a pies player of course.....) then the judiciary are all over them like a rash.
Then how do you explain the Lade decision (In him not being a Pie player but getting off)? By his own admission was playing the man not the ball, kneeing someone in the ribcage is pretty bad, I could cop him getting off as Staff did if he was playing the ball not the man, but you look at the shot and he was clearly playing the man.... Just as Rocca was yesterday... If the Port player isn't injured (Don't know if he is or isn't) ... Then the precedent has been set... He should get off.
& they rubbed Cloke out of a GF last eyar, they cannot possibly be
that biased towards the Pies. I think your getting your teams mixed up.... Lloyd's one week suspensions for head butts won't be forgotten easilly...