There's really no need to argue in favour of the fact that part of a halves job is to organise the team, it's the evidence against that fact which needs to presented if Pou wants to make his point.
My point always was that there is no reason to get rid of Sandow, other than his defence.
This point stands on a number of arguments, all of which need to be refuted for it to be proven invalid. Indeed, it is my opponents who are ignoring the entire argument in order to focus on a perceived small victory.
The popular argument is that Sandow should be moved on because he's not an organiser. This is an untrue statement if
any one of the following arguments are true:
1. Sandow is an organiser
2. Organisational ability is unimportant
3. Someone other than the halfback can do the organising
Unless
all of these statements are false, then Sandow is capable of being a key member of a high scoring attacking unit, like he was from '09-'11.
