flippikat
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,215
I like that it faces the opposite direction to the Broncos head too. They can look each other in the eyes.
One of the serious bidders are the Brisbane Firehawks, who are competing for the NRL’s 17th licence along with the Redcliffe Dolphins and Brisbane Jets.
The Firehawks are being funded by the Brisbane Tigers, better known as Easts Tigers, who have been around since 1934.
It’s an old club with a booming Leagues Club, plenty of juniors and resources, but it’s taking a wildly unique approach in order to convince the wise souls on the ARL Commission it should be given the green light.
In doing so, the bid handed the reins to Rich Digital, the sports consultancy firm of former South Sydney boss Shane Richardson and his son, Brent, who has been working for Google in New York shaping marketing and data strategy for brands such as The New York Times, Netflix and IBM.
At its core, the Firehawks’ bid is about being everything the Broncos are not. They don’t want to take on the Broncos, Titans and Cowboys, something the ARLC is conscious about as it weighs up the three bids.
“We’re hunters not cannibals,” Shane said. “We are hunting new business and new people. Everyone can sign Wayne Bennett. Everyone can sign Cameron Munster. The hard part of the business is attracting new members and corporate sponsors who aren’t involved in rugby league. There are sponsors out there who haven’t been involved before because they want to be involved in a modern platform that’s appealing to an age group that isn’t already rusted on. We’re trying to attract new fans from the age of 15 to 35 and you can only do that by building a digital base that you can sell to the market.”
The Richardsons were reluctant to hand over too much detail about the bid before the Firehawks’ official launch in Brisbane next Tuesday.
Interestingly, before Magic Round the NRL warned all bidders about creating too much dialogue in the media. Unsurprisingly, several senior reporters have been wined and dined in BrisVegas over the past few days as the battle for the licence cranks up.
What the Richardsons will tell you is they are modelling themselves on one of the biggest sporting franchises in the world.
“The main guys we’ve looked at closely are the LA Lakers, the way they’ve commercialised their brand worldwide,” Brent said. “We’ve also looked at entertainment platforms like Spotify and how it builds loyalty among its users. And then brands like Red Bull and the way it markets itself. We’ve been lucky that we’ve been given this clean slate in building this franchise.”
“We want to be the outlaws,” Shane said. “It will be totally different to what the Jets and Redcliffe are doing.”
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/th...ation-from-the-la-lakers-20210513-p57rn4.html
Yeah I thought it would be good to have the Broncos and Firehawks/Raptors logo staring at each other when put side by side.I like that it faces the opposite direction to the Broncos head too. They can look each other in the eyes.
It doesn't matter what name you come up with there will always be a percentage of the audience who doesn't like it for whatever reason.Firehawks just screams ‘marketing department trying to be creative’ to me
This means absolutely nothing, but if I lived in Brisbane and didn’t go for the broncos, I couldn’t see myself getting behind them.
If you have to explain what a mascot is, then it’s not a good mascot in my opinion
I'd be looking at not going with firehawks, i get that the bid roll out is today, but people are already confused, at the natures arsonist, even if they just kept it simple like "brisbane hawks"Yeah I thought it would be good to have the Broncos and Firehawks/Raptors logo staring at each other when put side by side.
NHL wouldn't be able to contest since their branding is a predator, and well that could be anything.Don’t get me wrong, I love smilodon, and in my opinion the Nashville Predators have one of the coolest brands in the world.
But a smilodon brand makes no sense whatsoever in an Australia context, and it would be so easy to put an Aussie spin on the brand by replacing the sabertooth with a thylacoleo (marsupial lion).
That way it would be unique and Australian, and you wouldn’t risk the NHL getting suing your arse off.
They could still challenge the imagery despite the teams not sharing a name, and it’d be pretty easy to argue that the brands are similar enough to confuse the consumer.NHL wouldn't be able to contest since their branding is a predator, and well that could be anything.
Because in this context East Brisbane only represents a relatively tiny area.Why not call the team the “East Brisbane firehawks”?
Or are the colours enough to incorporate the tigers side of things?
Not a bad idea, still prefer tiger snakes though.I suggested to Des Morris a decade ago that the team change its name to Quolls or Tiger Quolls, as spotted-tailed quolls are also known as tiger quolls. He said the club had no intention of changing its name.
That would be sh#t. Surely the whole point of Brisbane2 is to be a Brisbane city based and named side.At the press conference it looked like they’ve dropped the “Brisbane” from the logo. They are trying to make it a national brand, based in Brisbane. Don’t know how that will go for them with their bid. Firehawks though. That won’t be changed unless they have to.
Brisbane City Sabre's solves all their issues, keeps the tigers colors of orange and black, and brisbane city trim colors of blue and goldThat would be sh#t. Surely the whole point of Brisbane2 is to be a Brisbane city based and named side.