JokerEel
Coach
- Messages
- 12,595
Listen, wake the F up.
Do you think that we signed Brown for unders because we gave him perpetual PO's? From all reports he is on a very decent wicket.
Sure a desperate club may have offered him a hundred grand more or so, but do you really think that he would have speared off and gone to say the Tigers? Quality clubs would not have paid him more than what we have I can assure you. Which would be upwards of $800K.
He was given multiple PO's because we have weak and ineffective people in charge of R&R that have no idea how to set the club up for long term success. Period!
The proof is in the pudding and that's why we are in the predicament we are in right now and the laughing stock of the league and have been for a very long time even when we are a team that has a capable roster too. No one including opposition players feel or think we can go on with it and win the title for varying reasons and it all starts at the top.
In the end the club did the right thing ffs .
If we didn't offer both Moses or Brown a PO we may have been able to hold onto a few juniors who play in the halves as they may have had a path to first grade .
But as soon as we gave both Moses and Brown options for another 5 years those kids jumped ship and the funny part is we could lose both Moses and Brown if they don't take up their option as well as Sanders and Blaize...