If we take our resident forum clown seriously, apparently it's due to some vague unquantifiable notion to do with saving an intangible amount of money form the future salary cap - which can't be allocated elsewhere in the meantime anyway...I just wonder why a top performing club would see the need to do give a player like Grant the ability to walk out on his contract early.
So you have no real idea why Melbourne or us would offer a PO either then?If we take our resident forum clown seriously, apparently it's due to some vague unquantifiable notion to do with saving an intangible amount of money form the future salary cap - which can't be allocated elsewhere in the meantime anyway...
Right so it seems you (and no one else) actually don't have a serious answer to why we (and Melbourne) offered PO's to key players.
for how long ? Next year ?
I doubt Sanders and/or Talagi would have waited another 2 years to get an NRL gig and it would have been too early to pension off Moses and/or Dylbro anyway
I'm not a fan of POs but in this case, I don't think it would have prevented either of those 2 from leaving to play in the halves elsewhere and neither is good enough to force their way in and push our current 2 halves into playing Cup