I'm a loser baby...
Immortal
- Messages
- 42,876
This is why you are a powerful millionaire.I've got 20modd growing
This is why you are a powerful millionaire.I've got 20modd growing
Just use a bigger glass.No. Glasses. Indid have 4 on Friday but and it effected my sleep.
3 is ideal amount for a small sized human like myself.
This is why you are a powerful millionaire.
You think we should be taking more risks and trying to score on every set rather than build pressure and force the opposition to make tackles?In terms of the 'tactics' we should use in the opposition 20, I would like to see us attack the right side on one play and then attack the left side the very next play with bodies in motion. Watch how many times we have set up plays. We burn 3-4 tackles a set doing this. I made a comment to those i was watching with during the Bunnies game before our set started "Watch us burn 3 three tackles on the right to set up for a backline play to the left, then come back towards the left post for the kick" Sure enough that was the set. We had 1 legitimate attacking play in the whole set before the kick. Souths obviously knew every play that was coming. Unfortunately that is our standard set.
Nonwonder you are a powerful millionaire.I've got 20modd growing
Nonwonder you are a powerful millionaire.
FFS only about 40 mins too late.Nonwonder you are a powerful millionaire.
2 backline plays instead of 1 in the opposition 20? Yes I'd be prepared to take that risk. Our go to of repeated crash balls are actually risky because they put the receiver under immense pressure and we aren't getting results from them. And the defence still has to make tackles regardless if they are on the left, right or middle of the field. I'm not saying score off every set you peanut. I clearly said "in the opposition 20". Do you think we are going to have every set in the opposition 20?You think we should be taking more risks and trying to score on every set rather than build pressure and force the opposition to make tackles?
We should be better at creating space and overlaps. I think we’re pretty average at it for a first grade side. I think Sivo masks over a lot of our attacking deficiencies because he’s so powerful and doesn’t need as much space as most wingers to get over. If it was say Simonsson I don’t think we score as many tries on that wing.You think we should be taking more risks and trying to score on every set rather than build pressure and force the opposition to make tackles?
The Cowboys are fourth in points scored with a spine of Drinkwater, Dearden, Townsend and Robson. Would you rate that spine better than ours?Its funny how a lot of these comments about tactics point more to skill levels and player execution than they do tactics.
See Barlow, spilling the ball at the line with the game in his hands, at the end of the finals game against Penrith.Our go to of repeated crash balls are actually risky because they put the receiver under immense pressure and we aren't getting results from them.
Have you ever dropped food on the floor and then picked it up to eat it?The Cowboys are fourth in points scored with a spine of Drinkwater, Dearden, Townsend and Robson. Would you rate that spine better than ours?
Have you ever dropped food on the floor and then picked it up to eat it?
No, that would be like making week 1 of the finals and getting smashed and then talking us up on how we’re a team that consistently makes the finals.Have you ever dropped food on the floor and then picked it up to eat it?
I might not eat soup I've dropped on the floor but pretty much everything else is fair game.
When we lose our halves always pass the ball more than when we win. Yes I'm implying causation but the fact is it's just not that easy to go around teams. You need to earn the right, and that means pressuring the middle. I think as Parra fans we can get fooled into thinking it's all about throwing the ball wide because it appears to work so well against us. But it only works when teams force us to compress. It's the same reason Sivo scores so many tries. For many of them he goes over untouched because we've forced the defence to come in, either by hammering Lane at them, or overloading their middle with our other forwards.2 backline plays instead of 1 in the opposition 20? Yes I'd be prepared to take that risk.
I think we are, they're just not immediately apparent. The main result we get from the crash balls is space out wide later on.Our go to of repeated crash balls are actually risky because they put the receiver under immense pressure and we aren't getting results from them.
Yes of course I do.And the defence still has to make tackles regardless if they are on the left, right or middle of the field. I'm not saying score off every set you peanut. I clearly said "in the opposition 20". Do you think we are going to have every set in the opposition 20?
Yep. All these 'tactics' they see from other teams are built around smart playmakers. Really, outside of Gutherson we don't have those 'eyes up' players that some of the best teams have. So we play to our strengths instead.Its funny how a lot of these comments about tactics point more to skill levels and player execution than they do tactics.
It's at least as good. It's definitely smarter, and Drinkwater/Robson are more dangerous runners than our two. Moses is a better kicker than any of the Cowboys spine, but then he is a weaker defender as well.The Cowboys are fourth in points scored with a spine of Drinkwater, Dearden, Townsend and Robson. Would you rate that spine better than ours?