What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Eels Salary Cap MK II

How many pages in 24 hrs

  • 1-15

    Votes: 5 38.5%
  • 16-30

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • 31-45

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 45+

    Votes: 6 46.2%

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

ash411

Bench
Messages
3,411
SPOTTED II

Former Eels CEO Denis Fitzgerald lamenting Parramatta’s salary cap dramas in the same corporate suite as current chairman Steve Sharp during Sunday’s match against Penrith at Pirtek Stadium.

Can I ask a question? Why the f**k are they letting Fitzy anywhere near the stadium?

I would have already banned him from the LC, Stadium, and anywhere that the Eels are over a month ago.
 

forward pass

Coach
Messages
10,209
Yep, we are f**king cursed

Yep - this is the toughest club in the world to follow. I have supported this team for over 40 years and since about 1990 it has been a roller coaster with very few ups and plenty of downs.

It's almost like when we have a decent side and are set to make an impact - you ALWAYS know there will be some major clusterf**k that will derail everything whether it be a major injury, a top player walking out, internal dramas, making the GF and being beaten by an illegal side, blah blah blah. You couldn't write some of the shit we go through.
 

eels_fan

First Grade
Messages
7,584
Well the eels don't own the stadium, so unless he posed a security threat we may find it difficult to lawfully deny him access...
 

ash411

Bench
Messages
3,411
Well the eels don't own the stadium, so unless he posed a security threat we may find it difficult to lawfully deny him access...

I'm pretty sure, like any venue, the company using the venue reserve the right to refuse entry to anyone they want. And if there is anyone in the world that warrants being refused entry into pirtek stadium on gameday it's him.

I swear to god, don't any of you that actually have a vote let this prick get his slimy hands back into this club...
 

phantom eel

First Grade
Messages
6,327
If we lose 10 points, then it is time to focus on those who will be here next year and to give them experience,
Focus on the fans who'll still be here next year, or on the players? ;-)

If the NRL docks us 10 points for a silly error with the company on Watmough's TPA - when he hasn't played a game this year - then that'll do me!

It'd be time to call it quits, send my membership card back to the leagues club, onsell the season ticket, be happy with my memories of rugby league and stop watching games/posting here.
 

Basil Brush

Juniors
Messages
1,200
2 things.

Paul Kent is the most anti Parramatta person in the whole game. I would not listen to a thing he says re Parra.

If we lose points, i will give up on league this year and follow AFL as the NRL would prove themselves to be a joke.
 

hineyrulz

Post Whore
Messages
153,770
2 things.

Paul Kent is the most anti Parramatta person in the whole game. I would not listen to a thing he says re Parra.

If we lose points, i will give up on league this year and follow AFL as the NRL would prove themselves to be a joke.
:shock: Why would you want to punish yourself even more?????
 

Stagger eel

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
65,786
Focus on the fans who'll still be here next year, or on the players? ;-)

If the NRL docks us 10 points for a silly error with the company on Watmough's TPA - when he hasn't played a game this year - then that'll do me!

It'd be time to call it quits, send my membership card back to the leagues club, onsell the season ticket, be happy with my memories of rugby league and stop watching games/posting here.

Um aren't you being a little Hysterical???... I mean it's only 10 points, 5 lousy wins... It's noooooothing!
 

Casper The Ghost

First Grade
Messages
9,924
It is ONLY private corporations attacking a community run club controlled by membership of the community.

The law is dead and everyone and everything living is dead at law. By design, this is how the intent of ones will can surpass (be under-the-standing of) another = dictatorship.

This is what privatisation is all about. Freedom of choice is not freedom - the dictatorship provides/administrates choices (EVERYTHING) for consumers (those all dead at law underneath them). Internationalising private corporations is the New World Order in action.

If you really have a brain then use it because what is really going on is already in plain sight and has always been since this one world government plan was hatched.

Up to the 1950's/1960's all Australian citizens unconditionally received the inheritance created by their ancestors. It was their birth right, meaning they owned all roads, airports, government assets (federal/state/local), lighthouses, post offices, gas, electricity, telecommunication, etc, etc......

Australians already owned Telstra yet they were all conned to buy shares in Telstra, allowing privatisation to completely take over Australian telecommunication, etc. LOLLLLL

All forms of government are private corporations with everyone underneath them dead at law.

Thanks to privatisation, today, all "Australians" no longer can receive the legacy, the inheritance of their ancestors labour, instead what we now have in place is a user pay system (Lima Treaty/GAT/WTO), from birth to death (all of which is privatised too), where all Australian's are consumers sucking on the nipples of private corporations fully controlled by those who support the "Grand Plan" hatched long ago.

It is war against all of the living and Steve Sharp (and others) are resisting this take over.

Slavery anyone?

Anything in the way of privatising the whole of earth/creation (water/sky/space/celestial-bodies/MAN/nature/etc) must be taken over AT ALL COST.

RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.

Tell that to Steve Sharp.

Even the salary cap is dead at law. LOLLLLLLLLLLLLL
 

Gary Gutful

Post Whore
Messages
52,992
It is ONLY private corporations attacking a community run club controlled by membership of the community.

The law is dead and everyone and everything living is dead at law. By design, this is how the intent of ones will can surpass (be under-the-standing of) another = dictatorship.

This is what privatisation is all about. Freedom of choice is not freedom - the dictatorship provides/administrates choices (EVERYTHING) for consumers (those all dead at law underneath them). Internationalising private corporations is the New World Order in action.

If you really have a brain then use it because what is really going on is already in plain sight and has always been since this one world government plan was hatched.

Up to the 1950's/1960's all Australian citizens unconditionally received the inheritance created by their ancestors. It was their birth right, meaning they owned all roads, airports, government assets (federal/state/local), lighthouses, post offices, gas, electricity, telecommunication, etc, etc......

Australians already owned Telstra yet they were all conned to buy shares in Telstra, allowing privatisation to completely take over Australian telecommunication, etc. LOLLLLL

All forms of government are private corporations with everyone underneath them dead at law.

Thanks to privatisation, today, all "Australians" no longer can receive the legacy, the inheritance of their ancestors labour, instead what we now have in place is a user pay system (Lima Treaty/GAT/WTO), from birth to death (all of which is privatised too), where all Australian's are consumers sucking on the nipples of private corporations fully controlled by those who support the "Grand Plan" hatched long ago.

It is war against all of the living and Steve Sharp (and others) are resisting this take over.

Slavery anyone?

Anything in the way of privatising the whole of earth/creation (water/sky/space/celestial-bodies/MAN/nature/etc) must be taken over AT ALL COST.

RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.

Tell that to Steve Sharp.

Even the salary cap is dead at law. LOLLLLLLLLLLLLL

As good as it sounds, there are no good guys and bad guys in this story Casper.

Put 'Privatisation' aside and consider the human condition. Most people are greedy, slimy, selfish merkins and will do anything to get one over the next person.

In fact, while you were at your computer the other day I jumped your fence and stole your "tomato plants".
 

SDM

First Grade
Messages
7,600
This thread needs some youtube videos of Casper planting veges at his commune/swingers retreat.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...e/news-story/bccd39c3ceeac0257abbc0f4ff86c15d

Eels former boss Scott Seward under threat over NRL probe

The Australian
April 8, 2016 12:00AM

Margie McDonald
Sports reporter
Sydney

Former Parramatta chief executive Scott Seward has received threats warning him not to talk to the NRL about alleged disc*repancies with player third-party agreements while he was boss at the Eels.

Seward, who was unable to elab*orate on the details of the threats, said he would not comment publicly about his involvement or knowledge of Eels’ board matters. But he told The Aust*ralian he was willing to speak to the NRL if it felt he could add value to its integrity unit’s investigation.

Seward has maintained his *silence since he left the Eels last June, due to a confidentiality agreement, but that agreement expires on June 30.

If the Eels agree to let him speak to the NRL sooner, he could do so. However, he is under no obligation to talk as he is no longer involved in the sport.

Seward now lives in Melbourne, where he has a marketing-membership role with the MCG.

There have been reports that if Seward sat down with head of *integrity Nick Weeks, the Eels would want two representatives at the meeting. Seward is exploring the option of having his own *lawyer present.

While no players have done anything wrong, a number of TPAs signed with Parramatta are being looked into to make sure NRL rules were followed and the salary cap was not breached.

Under those rules, clubs cannot source TPAs on behalf of players and any agreements signed must be with companies, suppliers or sponsors at arm’s length from the respective club.

Meanwhile, the Eels have disputed reports yesterday that representatives of winger Semi Radradra requested an urgent TPA in 2014 so money could be sent back to his family in Fiji to *resolve a personal issue.

A statement yesterday said the “alleged TPA request” regarding Radradra had been rejected by the club’s head of football operations, Daniel Anderson, due to salary cap compliance.

The club said it instead worked collaboratively with the NRL and Radradra’s management on an alternative solution. The club then received written approval from salary cap auditors to make an advanced payment to the player for personal reasons on July 25, 2014.

“The Eels were not offered the opportunity to comment on this information before it went to print,” yesterday’s statement continued.

The club said Anderson was looking forward to discussing this and any other relevant issues with the NRL in due course.

Eels chairman Steve Sharp *reiterated that the club was determined to make sure its future governance practices were top-shelf and transparent.

“It is so important for the public, our members and fans to understand that the Parramatta Eels are undergoing a massive reform process, implementing 117 recommendations for reform from independent experts PricewaterhouseCoopers,” Sharp said.

“Further to that, a campaign of smear will not be permitted to undermine this reform. We are concerned that those attempting to smear the Eels are receiving untested and unwarranted media attention. Our message to those attempting to smear the club is that the current Eels’ leadership team will not be deterred from reforming the club.”

The club said it was looking at its legal options over the Radradra reports.

The NRL announced in Feb*ruary it was reviewing the club’s salary cap compliance in the midst of the latest TPA claims.

Parramatta received fines totalling $465,000 for breaches in their 2014 salary cap and were put on notice that the team would lose four competition points in 2016 if further breaches were uncovered.
 

phantom eel

First Grade
Messages
6,327
Um aren't you being a little Hysterical???... I mean it's only 10 points, 5 lousy wins... It's noooooothing!
Oh Stags, 4 points is nothing... don't you remember the posts you read? :lol:

10 points is a different ball game, and shows the NRL has caved into the interests of the media, an agenda being fed by factional warlords to wrest control of the club via/from its members.

Be very careful about what you're really supporting when you move/vote for that no confidence motion on 2 May ;-).
 

phantom eel

First Grade
Messages
6,327
So many inaccuracies in the journo'sntake on things...

While no players have done anything wrong, a number of TPAs signed with Parramatta are being looked into to make sure NRL rules were followed and the salary cap was not breached.

Under those rules, clubs cannot source TPAs on behalf of players and any agreements signed must be with companies, suppliers or sponsors at arm?s length from the respective club.
What are those rules? Is that the exact wording of the rules? What are the precise definitions of "cannot source" and "arms length", when clubs are required to include TPA details on player contracts they lodge with the NRL. If it's vague, then it could be successfully argued that we have done nothing wrong (despite the media/leaker hysteria).

The NRL announced in Feb*ruary it was reviewing the club?s salary cap compliance in the midst of the latest TPA claims.

Parramatta received fines totalling $465,000 for breaches in their 2014 salary cap and were put on notice that the team would lose four competition points in 2016 if further breaches were uncovered.
Was that what the four points was about? Or were they in case we didn't adequately implement the governance review recommendations? And hasn't the NRL announced that we passed that reuirement and the NRL is no longer holding those particular four points over our heads?

Don't jounros or their editors get paid to fact check any more... :crazy:
 

IFR33K

Coach
Messages
17,043
Geez, the articles are getting very repetitive. How many different variations can they produce..... We get it, we didn't declare tpa's.
 

emjaycee

Coach
Messages
13,826
So many inaccuracies in the journo'sntake on things...


What are those rules? Is that the exact wording of the rules? What are the precise definitions of "cannot source" and "arms length", when clubs are required to include TPA details on player contracts they lodge with the NRL. If it's vague, then it could be successfully argued that we have done nothing wrong (despite the media/leaker hysteria).


Was that what the four points was about? Or were they in case we didn't adequately implement the governance review recommendations? And hasn't the NRL announced that we passed that reuirement and the NRL is no longer holding those particular four points over our heads?

Don't jounros or their editors get paid to fact check any more... :crazy:

The suspended sentence was governance review AND no further breaches.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top