El Diablo
Post Whore
- Messages
- 94,107
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...e/news-story/87790f0a5b441b4da14fc68e83d1fcf6
Eels board member Moss urges hard look at ownership structure
News Limited
May 9, 2016 12:00AM
Brent Read
Senior sports writer
Sydney
Former investment banker and Parramatta board member Bill Moss says he has no interest in buying and running the Eels but agrees they must look at future ownership. Picture: Hollie Adams
Former Macquarie Bank boss Bill Moss insists he is not the man to run Parramatta but he has urged the Eels to have an open and honest discussion about the way forward before deciding whether privatisation should be part of the club’s future.
Moss, a long-time Eels supporter who almost joined the club’s board two years ago, has been linked with a bid to privatise Parramatta. While he confirmed he has received phone calls from as far afield as investment bankers and politicians, he insisted he had no desire to run the club. Instead, he suggested there needed to be a discussion about the club’s ownership structure to future-proof the Eels against their reliance on poker machine revenue from the Parramatta Leagues Club. “I have had people ring me up about privatisation,” Moss said. “I have had calls from investment banks, I have had calls from politicians, I have had calls from large companies, I have had calls from individuals who are saying what is going on.
“I am not the guy to privatise the Parramatta Eels. For some reason people think I am the guy who wants to get in there and run it. I am not that guy.
“What people don’t understand about this ... is that Parramatta rugby league team is the gateway to western Sydney. It has 500,000 followers, it has potential access to two million people.
“It is a very valuable product. It is a very valuable product, which if packaged properly, can do great things for western Sydney.
“There needs to be a discussion and a serious think-tank about what the future holds. Is it privatisation or is it not? What are the dangers of relying on a fat and lazy parent every year to get you out of jail.
“Does that go on forever? I don’t think it does. You can’t rely forever on poker machines. That discussion should involve the NRL as well. The world is changing. I am a fan of the club. I want to see them world class. I want to see them winning.”
Parramatta’s ownership structure has come under the spotlight following the salary cap scandal that threatens to strip the club of the 12 premiership points it has won this season.
Chairman Steve Sharp along with two other directors are facing deregistration after being caught up in the NRL investigation, the continuation of nearly a decade of unrest at board level.
The directors have made moves to stave off privatisation but Moss suggested the NRL had significant leverage over the club in the shape of participation agreements, which are due to expire for all clubs at the end of next year.
The game’s clubs are in negotiations with the NRL over the new perpetual agreements. Moss also warned the leagues club’s ability to fund the football club could dramatically alter if Western Sydney Wanderers supporters gained control of the board.
“The NRL owns the name, the brand, the contracts,” Moss said. “If you’re going to give a long-term licence to Parramatta Leagues Club, you would want to make very, very sure that agreement has what you need as a governing body of the sport that ensures it keeps going.
“The real risk is that a board comes along and decides it doesn’t want to put money into the Parramatta Eels. I would hope any new board going forward would seriously consider what is the future of this club and what does the ownership structure going to look like.
“The day that there are more Wanderers fans that are members of Parramatta Leagues Club than rugby league fans, is the day you have the board of the Parramatta Leagues Club run by Wanderers fans.
“A proper, prudent board should have a very serious look at what the long-term future of the Parramatta Eels is and how that can be funded without relying forever on a leagues club that I think is as vulnerable as a change in legislation in poker machines.”