What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Eels Salary Cap MK III

Status
Not open for further replies.

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...e/news-story/87790f0a5b441b4da14fc68e83d1fcf6

Eels board member Moss urges hard look at ownership structure

News Limited
May 9, 2016 12:00AM
Brent Read
Senior sports writer
Sydney

Former investment banker and Parramatta board member Bill Moss says he has no interest in buying and running the Eels but agrees they must look at future ownership. Picture: Hollie Adams

Former Macquarie Bank boss Bill Moss insists he is not the man to run Parramatta but he has urged the Eels to have an open and honest discussion about the way forward before deciding whether privatisation should be part of the club’s future.

Moss, a long-time Eels supporter who almost joined the club’s board two years ago, has been linked with a bid to privatise Parramatta. While he confirmed he has received phone calls from as far afield as investment bankers and politicians, he insisted he had no desire to run the club. Instead, he suggested there needed to be a discussion about the club’s ownership structure to future-proof the Eels against their reliance on poker machine revenue from the Parramatta Leagues Club. “I have had people ring me up about privatisation,” Moss said. “I have had calls from investment banks, I have had calls from politicians, I have had calls from large companies, I have had calls from individuals who are saying what is going on.

“I am not the guy to privatise the Parramatta Eels. For some reason people think I am the guy who wants to get in there and run it. I am not that guy.

“What people don’t understand about this ... is that Parramatta rugby league team is the gateway to western Sydney. It has 500,000 followers, it has potential access to two million people.

“It is a very valuable product. It is a very valuable product, which if packaged properly, can do great things for western Sydney.

“There needs to be a discussion and a serious think-tank about what the future holds. Is it privatisation or is it not? What are the dangers of relying on a fat and lazy parent every year to get you out of jail.

“Does that go on forever? I don’t think it does. You can’t rely forever on poker machines. That discussion should involve the NRL as well. The world is changing. I am a fan of the club. I want to see them world class. I want to see them winning.”

Parramatta’s ownership structure has come under the spotlight following the salary cap scandal that threatens to strip the club of the 12 premiership points it has won this season.

Chairman Steve Sharp along with two other directors are facing deregistration after being caught up in the NRL investigation, the continuation of nearly a decade of unrest at board level.

The directors have made moves to stave off privatisation but Moss suggested the NRL had significant leverage over the club in the shape of participation agreements, which are due to expire for all clubs at the end of next year.

The game’s clubs are in negotiations with the NRL over the new perpetual agreements. Moss also warned the leagues club’s ability to fund the football club could dramatically alter if Western Sydney Wanderers supporters gained control of the board.

“The NRL owns the name, the brand, the contracts,” Moss said. “If you’re going to give a long-term licence to Parramatta Leagues Club, you would want to make very, very sure that agreement has what you need as a governing body of the sport that ensures it keeps going.

“The real risk is that a board comes along and decides it doesn’t want to put money into the Parramatta Eels. I would hope any new board going forward would seriously consider what is the future of this club and what does the ownership structure going to look like.

“The day that there are more Wanderers fans that are members of Parramatta Leagues Club than rugby league fans, is the day you have the board of the Parramatta Leagues Club run by Wanderers fans.

“A proper, prudent board should have a very serious look at what the long-term future of the Parramatta Eels is and how that can be funded without relying forever on a leagues club that I think is as vulnerable as a change in legislation in poker machines.”
 

Snoochies

First Grade
Messages
5,634
The smoking gun. Apologies if it was already posted.


It's been called the smoking gun in the NRL's investigation into Parramatta and its contents can finally be revealed.

As a minimum I feel that we should self-report ScoreCube and flag that we have investigations ongoing.
Email from Parramatta CFO Ed Farish to chairman Steve Sharp, CEO John Boulous and football manager Daniel Anderson​
An email, sent by the club's then chief financial officer Ed Farish to chairman Steve Sharp, chief executive John Boulous and football manager Daniel Anderson last July, warns them of "exposures" around third-party deals for Anthony Watmough. The email also noted Farish's suspicions of a system of inflated invoices with club suppliers, and advises them to self-report to the NRL.
Email warning: Parramatta directors were warned about salary cap breaches.


Obtained by Fairfax Media from a source close to the investigation, the details of Farish's urgent note to senior officials played a major part in the heavy sanctions handed down last week by the NRL.
Advertisement

Farish explains his concerns about Watmough's deals with ScoreCube – whose parent company Black Citrus had been signed by former CEO Scott Seward to a $200,000-plus contract to provide digital services to Parramatta – and PJ Promotions, a company owned by the father of public relations executive Tracy McKelligott, who was a club consultant from 2013 until last July.
The officials' failure to disclose the deals when they were made aware of them, along with damning transcripts of third-party agreements being discussed at recorded board meetings, were central to the investigators' case against the club and the five current officials implicated.
Email warning: Parramatta chairman Steve Sharp. Photo: Shu Yeung


"Gents, on Monday the 20th of July [NRL salary cap auditor] Jamie L'Oste Brown is due to conduct a mid-year salary cap review," Farish wrote in the email, dated July 10, 2015, with the subject line 'TPA'.
"We've identified the following exposures around potential deals on TPAs. I'm anxious to ensure that everyone is on the same page in dealing with these. If a TPA is not registered and discovered, Jamie can refuse to make it cap exempt."
Under the heading of 'registered TPA' Farish continued: "TPAs are exempt from the cap under certain conditions. The main condition is that the company is not an associated entity. We have two TPAs registered for Anthony Watmough being ScoreCube $75,000 and PJ Promotions $50,000. ScoreCube is a 100 per cent subsidiary of Black Citrus who are a supplier of PNRL. Stephen Moss is the only director and the ScoreCube website is heavily branded Black Citrus.
"PJ Promotions are associated with [club consultant] Tracy. This condition is not as obvious as the Black Citrus connection but the NRL may query why a Newcastle-based promotion company want to spend $50,000-a-year for four years on Watmough. Tracy was promised reciprocal funding by Scott but has executed a TPA for four years with no matching funding.
"In summary, my major concerns are: ScoreCube TPA is easily connected to the club and even though it's approved at the moment the rules give the NRL ample room to reverse the decision. As a minimum I feel that we should self-report ScoreCube and flag that we have investigations ongoing."
The email, which was CC'd to the club's lawyer, John De Mestre, also raises issues with the club's relationships with suppliers including Zibara and E-Group Security, outlining Farish's suspicions that invoices had been inflated.
Fairfax Media has seen proof of the lucrative four-year arrangement between the Eels and Black Citrus, signed by Seward and Stephen Moss, the son of former Macquarie Bank executive Bill Moss, to start on January 1, 2015. The agreement states that the "PNRLC shall pay Black Citrus an annual fee of $221,996 plus GST paid in quarterly instalments of $55,499 plus GST" for digital services, digital advisory fees, a player management platform and a junior league licence.
The document notes that "no party may publicise in the media the existence of this Heads of Agreement or any of its terms". Parramatta directors have said privately that the board was not told by Seward of the deal.
Eels officials spent the weekend poring over hundreds of pages of transcripts from interviews conducted by NRL investigators, including evidence given by Seward and former team manager Jason Irvine.
Sources said they were not provided with a copy of McKelligott's voluntary interview and received only a statement from Seward dated May 2, the day before NRL chief Todd Greenberg announced the Eels' 12-point deduction and $1 million fine.
An NRL spokesman said: "Parramatta have been provided with the evidence that the NRL based its decision on."
Lawyers for Sharp, directors Tom Issa and Peter Serrao, Boulous and Anderson return to the NSW Supreme Court in Sydney for a hearing on Monday. They have argued they have not received procedural fairness from the NRL.
Ian Schubert, who is leading Parramatta's bid to be cleared as salary cap compliant in time for Friday's match against South Sydney, is also due to meet with L'Oste Brown on Monday.
Sharp, Boulous, Anderson and De Mestre did not return calls on Sunday.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...arty-deals-20160508-gop83q.html#ixzz486zwvqHy
Follow us: @smh on Twitter | sydneymorningherald on Facebook
 
Last edited:

84 Baby

Referee
Messages
29,700

Instead, the only information provided in relation to Seward was a single statement signed on May 2 ? the day before the NRL handed down sanctions against the club.

Seward was only allowed to provide evidence to the NRL after the Eels agreed to relent on a confidentiality clause related to his departure from the club.

In my industry, 'signing' something the 'day before' can be a massive red flag
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,628
Just fantasizing here but imagine of Kate has massive shit on this. It could force the NRL to back down on us and declare an amnesty with all TPAs coming to an end in 201X.
 

Bigfella

Coach
Messages
10,102
There are a lot of legal assertions I this thread which are just simply wrong.

The Contracts Review Act doesn't apply to corporations, or business related matters.

Our claim in the court is very likely for judicial review (based on the reports in the media - I haven't seen the court documents), which means it will be in the common law division, and not the equity division.

Mena rea is a criminal law concept which won't apply.

People should bear in mind too that the court action is not going to result In the court conducting a merits review ie making a decision on how many if any points should be deducted, or whether we are in breach.
 
Messages
12,177
Former investment banker and Parramatta board member Bill Moss says he has no interest in buying and running the Eels

he doesn't want to run the club all he wants to do is set up the deal and cut himself a thick slice of commission the maggot
 
Messages
13,876
Back on the Seward evidence not being shown in full to the club.
I'd say a lot of what he said incriminates himself and his mate Greenberg said he would look after him. So why should board members and the New CEO cop all the flack when a lot of it seems to involve Seward and was started while Seward was there.
Seward stuffed up Hoppa's contract and it's going to cost the club over a $1mil, he drew up a contract that allowed Foran to walk and get $1mil payout, he added a year to Watmough's contract, 4 years for a old guy close to retirement with 2 years left in him at best.
Something funny is going on here....
Was he a plant by the NRL to make these errors to help the NRL get what they want which is some members on our board?
Did he learn it all at the Bulldogs?
 

Chipmunk

Coach
Messages
17,375
Back on the Seward evidence not being shown in full to the club.
I'd say a lot of what he said incriminates himself and his mate Greenberg said he would look after him. So why should board members and the New CEO cop all the flack when a lot of it seems to involve Seward and was started while Seward was there.
Seward stuffed up Hoppa's contract and it's going to cost the club over a $1mil, he drew up a contract that allowed Foran to walk and get $1mil payout, he added a year to Watmough's contract, 4 years for a old guy close to retirement with 2 years left in him at best.
Something funny is going on here....
Was he a plant by the NRL to make these errors to help the NRL get what they want which is some members on our board?
Did he learn it all at the Bulldogs?

That is some conspiracy theory you've got going there.
 
Messages
19,389
There are a lot of legal assertions I this thread which are just simply wrong.

The Contracts Review Act doesn't apply to corporations, or business related matters.

The national legislation has recently been changed to effectively include small businesses and franchisees in the scope of the consumer law provisions re unfair contracts. But the NRL club wouldn't qualify for that extension of scope.
 

84 Baby

Referee
Messages
29,700
Back on the Seward evidence not being shown in full to the club.
I'd say a lot of what he said incriminates himself and his mate Greenberg said he would look after him. So why should board members and the New CEO cop all the flack when a lot of it seems to involve Seward and was started while Seward was there.
Seward stuffed up Hoppa's contract and it's going to cost the club over a $1mil, he drew up a contract that allowed Foran to walk and get $1mil payout, he added a year to Watmough's contract, 4 years for a old guy close to retirement with 2 years left in him at best.
Something funny is going on here....
Was he a plant by the NRL to make these errors to help the NRL get what they want which is some members on our board?
Did he learn it all at the Bulldogs?

Yeah... na.

Though does it appear that Seward willingly use his own f**k ups to further f**k up the club, or more likely certain others at club? Potentially
 

SharkShocked

Bench
Messages
4,540
tin-foil-hat-1002-cropped.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top