I'm a loser baby...
Immortal
- Messages
- 42,876
How do you think it will come back to haunt Greenberg?
What if the next team gets found out to be $10,000 over the cap, but they're discovered in round 14?
How do you think it will come back to haunt Greenberg?
Surely that concept is better than the concept that if you are not cap compliant you are free to earn as many points as you like?
There needs to be a much closer relationship to the scale of the breach. Not this simple compliant/non compliant nonsense.
The NRL in their press conference did reference the scale of our breach. And it was huge. Hence our big penalty
They wouldnt listen to anything that ian questioned
I deadset reckon we are pissing into the wind with our response ... no way the merkins will back down and lose face
At the end of the day the NRL had an agenda with how they have handled it ... they let it drag along until we had accrued a number of points that they could take to make it a very hard ask to recover from ... they believe our management is incompetant and have been doing all they can to get rid of them
Their agenda ended up
a) get rid of board members and management staff
b) make us lose at least one quality player ... not including watmough who it was obvious was gone regardless
even if we had only needed to drop 400k, they would have likely drawn a line and not included watmough at all to force us to lose another player
They wouldnt listen to anything that ian questioned - they just wanted us to drop that quality player
At the end of the day the NRL had an agenda with how they have handled it ... they let it drag along until we had accrued a number of points that they could take to make it a very hard ask to recover from ... they believe our management is incompetant and have been doing all they can to get rid of them
Their agenda ended up
a) get rid of board members and management staff
b) make us lose at least one quality player ... not including watmough who it was obvious was gone regardless
even if we had only needed to drop 400k, they would have likely drawn a line and not included watmough at all to force us to lose another player
They wouldnt listen to anything that ian questioned - they just wanted us to drop that quality player
Agenda? You make it sound like the NRL was after us just for the hell of it.
The introduction of the concept that a team that is not cap compliant can't earn points will probably come back to haunt Greenberg and co. Sadly it will be too late for us.
Of course they mentioned it . They could hardly not. But they didn't punish us by taking x amount of points, they punished us by taking any points earned while we were non compliant. Then refused to let us earn points while we were still be over. How much we were over was clearly irrelevant. They didn't say, "get close enough and you're good to go."
Agenda? You make it sound like the NRL was after us just for the hell of it.
Losing face...that's the real stumbling block, here. There was a bit of a rush job by the NRL to try and get us to shit our pants and become compliant with no resistance by the Souths game. To an extent, it worked. But if resistance comes now then the one obstacle we face more than any other is the NRL losing face. Now that we've been forced to shed Peats the NRL can't let us get ourselves back into a respectable position regarding our breaches. Which is why court has always been a real option if we truly believe this whole thing has been exaggerated. We need to be figuring out a way to get this into court because the NRL are not going to just roll over and drop our penalty from 12 to 4 after accepting our interpretation of the findings. I believe our response will get us no reprieve. If we want one, we need a strategy to get this in front of a court.I deadset reckon we are pissing into the wind with our response ... no way the merkins will back down and lose face
Jake, it may not have been the NRL who was after us, but it was definitely the internal rats who leaked everything to the media.
Even you have to understand that.