What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Eels Salary Cap Mk V

eels_fan

First Grade
Messages
7,587
Gee it's taking the NRL some time to make their final decision. What are they waiting for ?

Wasn't our response provided almost a month ago ?

Any chance our response may be giving them something to think about ?

Who the hell knows... Seriously it's become a joke.

If they eventually announce it and it's the same 12 points and $1m fine as per the initial breach I think we have a right to be bloody frustrated and annoyed.

The amount of time it's taken can really only be justified by a reduction in penalty based on our response and further investigation having been needed to validate the response, or an increase in penalty due to more information coming of hand based on our response (we did have a 'cheating' folder on our computers after all...
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,719
Leagues Club members asked to bail out Eels to tune of $10m
b5ad566523256b9e08bcd2d5c8142973

Nick Tabakoff, Editor-at-Large, The Daily Telegraph
July 7, 2016 12:00am
Subscriber exclusive
b5ad566523256b9e08bcd2d5c8142973

THE scandal-plagued Parramatta Eels will cop a record $10 million-plus loss for the 2016 year, following the exposure of its systematic salary cap cheating program.

The huge loss will force the NRL club’s cashed-up parent, the Parramatta Leagues Club, to cover the massive sum just to bail the Eels out.

The Daily Telegraph understands before the salary cap scandal broke, internal projections at the Eels were that Parramatta would require an $8m handout from the Leagues Club for 2016.

But the club is now projecting this figure will blow out by $2 million-plus to between $10-$10.5m because of:

● The NRL’s imminent $1m fine on the club;

● Its loss of two major sponsors, Infinity and Cleanaway, following the cheating revelations ($550,000 a year);

● Spiralling and ongoing legal fees for both the Eels’ “Gang of Five” and some of its troubled players ($500,000 and counting), and;

● Loss of its prizemoney from winning this year’s Auckland Nines ($370,000);

These factors alone mean the club’s losses will now easily top $10m for the 2016 season, and possibly more.This will put yet more pressure on the beleaguered Eels, days out from the likely final bans of the Gang of Five — suspended Eels chairman Steve Sharp, CEO John Boulous, deputy chairman Tom Issa, director Peter Serrao and football boss Daniel Anderson — over the cap cheating.

The massive loss takes subsidies given by the Leagues Club to the Eels to more than $18 million for the 2015 and 2016 financial years: making the club by far the most financially dependent in the NRL.

The subsidies provided by the Leagues Club — the member-based, pokie palace in Parramatta’s heart — mean members’ money is bailing out the operations of the football club.

The Eels have for some time been relying on the rich Leagues Club, which in 2015 had record revenue of $82m, total members funds of $54m, and profits of $6.6m.

Ex-Eels sponsors Infinity ($400,000 a year) and Cleanaway ($150,000 a year) both invoked clauses allowing them to depart because their brands were brought into “disrepute” by the scandal.

Infinity has been replaced by Eels apparel partner Blades as back-of-jersey sponsor for the Eels — for a fraction of the original Infinity deal.

The contract of the club’s major sponsor, Dyldam, is also up for renewal at the end of 2016.

Meanwhile, a second proposal to overthrow the Eels board was registered with the club yesterday, with a third expected to be lodged shortly.

Eels member Chris Losco, who is leading one of the proposals to be put to an extraordinary meeting in late August, said yesterday: “The financial mismanagement of the Eels shows this board is incapable of turning around the performance of what should be a powerhouse of Australian sport.”

Eels interim boss Ian Schubert could not be reached for comment.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...m/news-story/b5ad566523256b9e08bcd2d5c8142973
 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,988
We should get our creditors to just write off $6M in debt and then call ourselves financially viable .... worked well for souths :thumn
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,656
Pardon me for being a skeptic but how does an editor at large get access to our books ?

Difficult to believe any of this unless the Eels came out and admitted it.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,719
Well clearly Eels member Chris Losco spoke to Tabakoff yesterday. As much as I like his merit proposal, he loses points for talking to the media merkin who was the conduit to the leaker that brought us down.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,656
I wouldn't say clearly

Eels member Chris Losco, who is leading one of the proposals to be put to an extraordinary meeting in late August, said yesterday: “The financial mismanagement of the Eels shows this board is incapable of turning around the performance of what should be a powerhouse of Australian sport.”
 

emjaycee

Coach
Messages
13,853
Well clearly Eels member Chris Losco spoke to Tabakoff yesterday. As much as I like his merit proposal, he loses points for talking to the media merkin who was the conduit to the leaker that brought us down.

Whilst I have no time for Tabakoff personally and don't care to, if Losco doesn't use the press to the advantage of the merit proposal, you can bet your bottom dollar the other petition owners will and we might just see one of them get passed at the AGM. Tabakoff might have been the conduit, but we shouldn't shoot the messenger - shoot the leaker.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,656
Whilst I have no time for Tabakoff personally and don't care to, if Losco doesn't use the press to the advantage of the merit proposal, you can bet your bottom dollar the other petition owners will and we might just see one of them get passed at the AGM. Tabakoff might have been the conduit, but we shouldn't shoot the messenger - shoot the leaker.

I really hope Losco doesn't use this issue to push for his own superheros to get in, so yeh I agree. He is just an ordinary member isn't he so he would not have access to our financials.
 

ash411

Bench
Messages
3,411
I really hope Losco doesn't use this issue to push for his own superheros to get in, so yeh I agree. He is just an ordinary member isn't he so he would not have access to our financials.

For his proposal to work at all no one should have influence over who is chosen, that was the whole point of it, right?
 

emjaycee

Coach
Messages
13,853
I really hope Losco doesn't use this issue to push for his own superheros to get in, so yeh I agree. He is just an ordinary member isn't he so he would not have access to our financials.

I can't see where he has had access to the financials - the PLC give about $8M every year (and that is publicly available after each AGM) and the rest is just doing some sums and making some phones calls. Doesn't need an editor-at-large to do some sums.
 

phantom eel

First Grade
Messages
6,327
The article implies that several proposals will be put to an EGM in late August... does this mean Losco's and Eagleston's (and anyone else's) are to all be put to the same meeting?

Or is it one meeting per petitioned proposal received, in order of first in, first served?
 
Last edited:

oldmancraigy

Coach
Messages
11,960
Pardon me for being a skeptic but how does an editor at large get access to our books ?

Difficult to believe any of this unless the Eels came out and admitted it.

What are you talking about?
The Board talked about it at a meeting, recorded it, and posted the recording on youtube.
 

84 Baby

Referee
Messages
29,820
The article implies that several proposals will be put to an EGM in late August... does this mean Losco's and Eagleston's (and anyone else's) are to all be put to the same meeting?

Or is it one meeting per petitioned proposal received, in order of first in, first served?
Surely knowing that more than one proposal is likely than it'll be just one EGM with a 2 or 3-way vote to determine which proposal gets the nod.

You couldn't... sorry you shouldn't, because you probably can, vote on first proposal, change directors and then have a vote on 2nd proposal and possibly change directors again within couple of days. Because that would be f**king stupid.... therefore our club will probably have 3 EGMs in next two months
 
Messages
15,510
Oh no.

So wait a sec, the club got 8 million a year from the leagues club, and still posted a $6.6m profit and are building all the new stuff that we will all take advantage of once Eels games come back to Parramatta when the new stadium is built.

8 Mil a year sounds about the norm for us as far as I can remember.
 

Latest posts

Top