I think the reason is two-foldaqua_duck said:Our recruitment of late has been stupid, why aren't we signing good young players like Willie Tonga instead of re-signing has beens like Hughes for 5 times as much money.
Sure he had every right to do it, I'm not saying he didn't. What I am saying is whilst he moaned and groaned about us losing Kennedy, Tahu and c/o, and supposedly tried to talk Kennedy into staying, he didn't do anything to make it any easier. Unlike Hindemarsh who means as much to the Eels as apparently Johns means to us. What I'm saying is Johns showed the club no consideration, where-as Hindemarsh did with his club. Whilst Johns stuffed around for the best part of 9 months and ended up taking what he was originaly offered anyway, with a little $50,000 sweetener added. He played this club like a violin, and they were stupid enough to go along with it. Johns knew the grief his inaction was causing, the club was weak to allow it to happen yes, but in the end that is why we missed signing some other players that were available, Johns has to shoulder some of the responsibilty for that. I'll predict now, that some time next year people here will be saying the same thing. Because effectively we are back in the same boat we were at the start of the year minus a few of our rep players, at the moment I'm really struggling to see where next year is going to be any better than this year, and I bet I'm not alone in that feeling.miladi said:I am sorry, Antonius, and I know you and I are never going to agree on this, however I don't blame Andrew Johns for the club failing to sign others. He had the right to wait until after June 30th if he had wanted to see what other clubs might offer. He didn't make the Newcastle management wait to see if he signed or not. They made that choice. They could have signed others and then said, sorry Joey we only have x amount to spend, take it or not. (then the outside sponsorship could have been arranged as it was). They made the choice to wait and overspend. Johns had every right to take it.
miladi said:I am sorry, Antonius, and I know you and I are never going to agree on this, however I don't blame Andrew Johns for the club failing to sign others. He had the right to wait until after June 30th if he had wanted to see what other clubs might offer. He didn't make the Newcastle management wait to see if he signed or not. They made that choice.
Kaz said:miladi said:I am sorry, Antonius, and I know you and I are never going to agree on this, however I don't blame Andrew Johns for the club failing to sign others. He had the right to wait until after June 30th if he had wanted to see what other clubs might offer. He didn't make the Newcastle management wait to see if he signed or not. They made that choice.
What other NRL showed interest in Joey. :roll:
Union 'were' interested in him.
And what a surprise his manager has quite a few Union Players on his books.
Joey knew the Knights management would stop most signings until he signed.
They should have signed the up & comers in the mean time instead of waiting until Joey made up his mind when he would finally sign the contract.
That says a lot about him doesn't it?borat said:I think the up & commers were as interested in waiting to see what he did because if Joey leaves there is a stack of money there for upgraded contracts.
I think the management had no choice but to hold out for Joey. Joey is the David Beckham of the NRL in terms of what he brings to the Knights off the field. With the club's finances the way they are I think the management realised that if Joey left not only would they loose their chief playmaker but the man most likely to pull in the sponsorship dollars and fill the ground on game day. There is such a belief out there that the Knights can't win without Joey that attracting new sponsors to a team minus Joey would be very difficult.
They knew Joey was screwing them over and setting up a auction between themselves and Union but really couldn't afford to do much about it.
Nuffy said:I think to be fair the timing of the Johns decision was irrelevant.
They would have assigned a top end figure and left it at that. Then they could have moved on to BK etc.
Make an allowance of 400k for Joey and then start talking to the others.
By most accounts we offered Tahu around 250K, I will always wonder what would have happened if they went to him last year and said "your a gun player, we would like to upgrade your contract for the next 3 years" I feel that he wouldn't have gone anywhere. He only became obsessed with money after all the media hysteria earlier this year.
We need to be extremely proactive with the players we want to keep, therefore, if the club hasn't signed both Danny and Abes before next season starts then we are an embarassment.
And plenty of the players that are currently on big money should be getting ready for a pay cut.
Plus the club needs to draw up a complete list of players off contract in the NRL and prepare a strategy for recruitment as required.
The embarassing scenes this year when we were playing catchup well after the June 30 deadline should never be repeated.
We need pace and aggression and I hope that the club is looking for those pieces right now.
Just another comment, has anyone else noticed that Reynoldson has been pretty much injured since he signed with us, nice omen and how good as Webb been playing, he may be the one that got away!!!
I actually think Michael Hagan has shown he is very good at developing players.Swampy said:I'll throw this question at you all.Say if the Knights had signed Willie Tonga instead of the Dogs do you reckon the Knights could have developed him into the player that he is today?In other words do the Knights coaching staff have the ability to develop players that show good qualities into an outstanding talent just like the Dogs did with Willie Tonga.Personally I think not.
Rip Taylor is a coach who knows how he wants people to play I'd say. He has always had the reputation of being a 'controlling' coach.Swampy said:Well you haven't really answered my question in regards to Willie Tonga.Yeah well Roopy with the players that you have mentioned which one of them could you honestly predict to play Origin within the foreseeable future.Don't get me started on how the Knights treat there younger players.Talking about Flegg I can tell you there have been a few of the younger ones brought up from SG Ball who have been well and truly the thrown in at the deep end and full credit to them in way they were forced to play to get a look in.Watch the games closely and you'll see what I mean.