As Telegraph readers I would hope you are more educated than the current postings seem to suggest.
Rugby League isn’t there to compete with rugby union (although 42% more TV viewers tune in to Super League than Guinness Premiership). This is the 21st Century and you can enjoy both league and union for their different merits.
Congratulations,an interesting piece of research.You may wish to underscore the thread,by looking at the BARB viewing figures for Union Premiership,versus League Super League.
In broad terms,league attracts an average of 33% more viewers than the Union Premiership.
I wouldn’t argue that your stats broadly indicate that attendance figures for Super League and Premiership,are roughly equal.Perhaps you should add to your research by comparing viewing figures from BARB - broadly speaking 200,000 plus for Super League and 125,000 ish for Premiership.
If only your paper allocated column inches on this basis.Assumimg you provide these figures to your Sports Editor,how does he justify the inequality of coverage?
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/sport/g...s_Premiership/