It was a matter of engineering mate, not short sighted-ness
Still, if it's not possible to re engineer the roof and fill in the 3rd tier than it will cost Brisbane any chance of host a WC semi final if we win the bid. Suncorp will need another 8000 seats, and yes I'm aware the site is restricted, so if Perth does the right thing it was be Brisbanes loss and Perth's gain.
Problem with that design of stadium is that it is fine if you are one of the lucky 20-25,000 on the lower tier when it is moved in (which given Etihad experience doesn't always happen anyway due to cost of doing it) but if you then end up on the 2nd or 3rd tier you are basically still in AFL configuration and miles from the pitch. Bring the binoculars! Also 20,000 in a 65,000 stadium is v poor for atmpsohpere and game day experience.
True but that is why the Stadium Taskforce suggested a 2 stadium plan. Only games garrenteed to be well over 22 000 (capacity of movable ground tier) would be played at the large stadium. Anyway the Barnett Government has said MES or a new Rectangle stadium will be built by 2013 based on Skilled Park. So even though he's tight lipped, he seems to have listened to enough people to understand the 2 stadium benefits. So a utilitarian 25 000 seat rectangle stadium for 2013 and an iconic major stadium for AFL, major RL, RU, soccer and 20Twenty, Oneday cricket. Well I'm hoping.
As for the view in the higher seats, yes it will be compromised but the stadium has superior sightlines to Etihad and the AFL dimensions are based on Subiaco oval which is 10m narrower than Etihad. In fact at centre wing (the widest part of the ground) this stadiums higher tiers will be slightly closer than ANZ Stadium.
I still think the Burswood solution would have been awsome for the city. A 65,000 AFL stadium, a 30,000 rectangular stadium and a entertainment precinct running along the Burswood foreshore. Oh for politicians with some vision!
That came down to the high cost of the structural foundations seeming as most of the belmont peninsula is reclaimed swamp and former rubbish tip. James Packer has offered to share costs in such a sports district but he requests gambling law changes in return such as Pokies which does not have public support in WA.
I remember in '96 when fans where playing up at the cr4p viewing at the WACA the suggestion the Reds would become the first RL team to play in an indoor stadium. They were trying to figure out how to get a grass pitch in and out of the Burswood doom. Now that would have been an amazing atmosphere!
I remeber that, it would have been awesome. The Reds sent Julian O'Neil into the dome to kick some high bombs to see if he could hit the roof which he couldn't (roof 35m high). May have saved the Reds if it wasn't for the $1million price tag on the unique grass from Tassie which could tolerate the diffussed light through the membrane of the Burswood Dome. Just think, totally intimate steep seating for 13500 in Rugby set up. The ingoal areas would have had to be 5m as the dome floor is only 118m long but who would have cared.