As an aside, this shows the utter rubbish that the Match Review Committee now comes out with.
When Klemmer and Graham stood over Gerard Sutton on Good Friday 2015, they were both slapped with 3 and 2 match bans respectively.
Now, Klemmer does the same thing and he's only facing a $3,000 fine. I know the whole judiciary system has had an overhaul since then - I'm not even sure we had fines in 2015 - but how is something worth 2-3 games back then now not worth missing any time over whatsoever?
100% skeepe, what you say combined with plenty of other comments is what is wrong with the code.
Gould gets a $20k fine for saying basically what many agree with.
“The weekend was a disgrace, it’s been bad,” Anasta said. (was that worth a fine?)
James Graham has questioned how the Bunker can make several poor decisions that impact stakeholders at all levels of rugby league. (was the following worth a fine?)
“We appreciate there’s difficult decisions to make, but there was some that were made by the Bunker that are unacceptable to the players who work so hard,” he said on NRL360.
“It’s unacceptable and not fair to the coaches that dedicate so much of their time. It’s not acceptable to the fans that dedicate their time around their team’s fixtures.
Not taking anything away from what you wrote about Klemmer but the 'game' including Albo & Annersley, the match review committee, the bunker, putting refs in charge who are not able to keep up with the play, etc etc is where the problems start from. Klemmer is a bully, but the referee's bosses are to blame for putting her (and I didn't want to bring gender into it) in such a position and when they the refs get dropped, they name them as the video refs and if they do have offsiders watching the game, they don't name them, so it's 1 name that cops the blame for the blunders.