Few Changes that Might Help

[Suitman]

True EEL is like our own little Bunniesman, he never fails to make himself look like a f**king idiot.

#WhatADopeyMerkin

Yep.

 

[TheParraboy]

what's really funny is you still don't get it bahahahahahahahahahahahha - but look you don't really want to know what i think of you, so maybe we just call it quits ok then champ, aaaallrighty then ;-)

I get why many think your nothing but a try hard ;-)

 

[oldmancraigy]

nicely worded, you have a strong grasp of the Englash langwidge :? :lol:

Could you perhaps point out the improper English in that bit you bolded?

Or is your grasp of English as poor as your understanding of rugby league?

 

[lingard]

appreciate the comments. i agree that Lock may be another option for Roberts - if he were to be shuffled around from 5/8. i only suggested centre as the main option as we have such a weakness there at left centre currently AND because i think Reni Maitua is going great at Lock AND because we need more size in the forwards overall and by playing both Roberts and Maitua in the backrow (because you're not going to drop Maitua obviously) only makes our pack that much smaller overall....

i like your thought process though for analysing the options and do understand what you're saying. i just personally believe that moving Hayne to 6 would improve our team (no surprises there), but i know this is a long shot to happen anyway.....unless perhaps he does kill it at 5/8 for City on the weekend, which even though I'm a Country boy, I'm hoping he does ;-)

Fair enough. It all gets back to the old debate of Hayne at five-eight. I don`t like him there and would prefer him at fullback. But plenty of good judges disagree with me. IF Hayne played five-eight for the Eels, Roberts might be a good fullback. We`re still left with the centre problem, but I think we need to buy one. (And another coach.) Seems some people here don`t appreciate that you apparently don`t like Ben Roberts. Well, I reckon they`re going to hate me soon, because I can`t stand this bloody coach of ours. Wish we could f**kin` stick him in the centres!

 

[True EEL]

Fair enough. It all gets back to the old debate of Hayne at five-eight. I don`t like him there and would prefer him at fullback. But plenty of good judges disagree with me. IF Hayne played five-eight for the Eels, Roberts might be a good fullback. We`re still left with the centre problem, but I think we need to buy one. (And another coach.) Seems some people here don`t appreciate that you apparently don`t like Ben Roberts. Well, I reckon they`re going to hate me soon, because I can`t stand this bloody coach of ours. Wish we could f**kin` stick him in the centres!

ha ha yeah there are plenty of headaches for Parra supporters alright Lingard, but i suppose we'll just have to battle through again like we have for what seems like forever!!? ;-)

yeah i understand plenty of people would prefer to see Hayne stay at Fullback rather than him go to 5/8 or any other position - and I can understand that too. I just think there is some REAL value in Hayne having his hands on the ball as much as possible and leading the team's attack from 5/8. He (and Sandow) could really make us a dynamic....

and its not that I don't like Ben Roberts, not that at all. I just prefer to have a realist view of his abilities. sure, he could even be trialed at fullback as well, like you are suggesting...??

don't get me started on SK ;-)

 

[True EEL]

I definitely considered that possibility.

I only have a 62 IQ - so intelligence isn't my strong point. But even a dolt like me can see that the author lacks very strongly in the making of intelligent threads.

OMC....you are joking right?? you can't seriously believe that is correct English?? :?
and if you're not and you think its ok.....well, then, good luck i guess ;-)

 

[Suitman]

OMC....you are joking right??

Wrong.

Suity

 

[Maroubra Eel]

Maybe HJ can sort this out.

 

[TheParraboy]

a poll would do it

 

[Maroubra Eel]

Who could be bothered setting one up though?

 

[Suitman]

Maybe HJ can sort this out.

I don't think so.
Easter is gone.

Suity

 

[oldmancraigy]

OMC....you are joking right?? you can't seriously believe that is correct English?? :?
and if you're not and you think its ok.....well, then, good luck i guess ;-)

Well, you're saying it's not.

Just wondering if you know why?

Just pointing out that you're all talk and no idea on most subjects (not just rugby league).

 

[oldmancraigy]

OMC....you are joking right?? you can't seriously believe that is correct English?? :?
and if you're not and you think its ok.....well, then, good luck i guess ;-)

What the heck, can't be bothered checking later to see what flummox you put forth:

For starters, your sentences are inept. Failure to use capitals, lack and incorrect usage of punctuation.


My sentence worked perfectly well - it was a trap for a moron, and you bit hard and fell far.

But even a dolt like me can see that the author lacks very strongly in the making of intelligent threads.

Object is the author (you).
Verb is lacks
Adverb is strongly (heightened by very)
Subject is the making of threads (notable, intelligent ones).

The observer is a 'dolt like me' who can see the above.


Thanks for playing. Done by a 62 IQ fool. Good job.

 

[TheParraboy]

What the heck, can't be bothered checking later to see what flummox you put forth:

For starters, your sentences are inept. Failure to use capitals, lack and incorrect usage of punctuation.


My sentence worked perfectly well - it was a trap for a moron, and you bit hard and fell far.

But even a dolt like me can see that the author lacks very strongly in the making of intelligent threads.

Object is the author (you).
Verb is lacks
Adverb is strongly (heightened by very)
Subject is the making of threads (notable, intelligent ones).

The observer is a 'dolt like me' who can see the above.


Thanks for playing. Done by a 62 IQ fool. Good job.

:lol:

 

[True EEL]

What the heck, can't be bothered checking later to see what flummox you put forth:

For starters, your sentences are inept. Failure to use capitals, lack and incorrect usage of punctuation.


My sentence worked perfectly well - it was a trap for a moron, and you bit hard and fell far.

But even a dolt like me can see that the author lacks very strongly in the making of intelligent threads.

Object is the author (you).
Verb is lacks
Adverb is strongly (heightened by very)
Subject is the making of threads (notable, intelligent ones).

The observer is a 'dolt like me' who can see the above.


Thanks for playing. Done by a 62 IQ fool. Good job.

wow, you totally got me there....wow, you are soooo learned ;-) i should listen to you more often......yeah i totally knew you were posing that sentence just to fool me, it was just a little bit strange and very funny when you tried to defend it initially :lol: nice cover up work though by google-ing some English lessons :lol: thanks i'll use that next time I need to publish a journal article ;-)

as for capitalisation, punctuation, grammar, etc (see i'm doing it again, just to prove i don't know how too) - i have said this time and again, an internet forum that is staked out by numerous moronic, cave-dwelling oxygen thieves is not a platform where i bother to waste any further precious time making my posts functionally or aesthetically correct - simply for the benefit of the afore-mentioned 'people'.....have a nice day though, ciao ;-)

 

[mickdo]

yeah i totally knew you were posing that sentence just to fool me

Yeah, sure you did

Grab me a filet-o-fish will you?

 

[oldmancraigy]

as for capitalisation, punctuation, grammar, etc (see i'm doing it again, just to prove i don't know how too) - i have said this time and again, an internet forum that is staked out by numerous moronic, cave-dwelling oxygen thieves is not a platform where i bother to waste any further precious time making my posts functionally or aesthetically correct - simply for the benefit of the afore-mentioned 'people'.....have a nice day though, ciao ;-)

Yes, I was hoping you'd have a simplistic response like this.

You might have forgotten that you are the one who resorted to criticism of grammar. Unfortunately you don't seem to have much of a grasp of it.


But mocking me to try and make yourself feel better seems to have worked.

No, I would NOT like a large fries with that.

 

[True EEL]

But mocking me to try and make yourself feel better seems to have worked.

OK, so this comment above = EPIC FAIL.

THIS is obviously the creed by which many people on this site seemingly live by, including, but not limited to: Suitman, Pou Pou, Parra Pride, Mickdo, SDM, The Parra Boy, OMC and a few others intermittently. That is all.

 

[lingard]

What the heck, can't be bothered checking later to see what flummox you put forth:

For starters, your sentences are inept. Failure to use capitals, lack and incorrect usage of punctuation.


My sentence worked perfectly well - it was a trap for a moron, and you bit hard and fell far.

But even a dolt like me can see that the author lacks very strongly in the making of intelligent threads.

Object is the author (you).
Verb is lacks
Adverb is strongly (heightened by very)
Subject is the making of threads (notable, intelligent ones).

The observer is a 'dolt like me' who can see the above.


Thanks for playing. Done by a 62 IQ fool. Good job.

You can have a lack of something or you can be lacking in a certain area, but you can`t 'lack very strongly', since a lack of something and a strength are incompatible ideas.
And the subject of the sentence is 'a dolt like me' (meaning you).
By the way, someone with a 62 I.Q. wouldn`t be as intelligent as you obviously are.

 

[oldmancraigy]

OK, so this comment above = EPIC FAIL.

THIS is obviously the creed by which many people on this site seemingly live by, including, but not limited to: Suitman, Pou Pou, Parra Pride, Mickdo, SDM, The Parra Boy, OMC and a few others intermittently. That is all.

You see - you did it again.