dd said:
genekrupa said:
See there's alway someone who has to resort to name calling. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Ahh The better the bait, the bigger the fish! :lol: :lol: :lol:
And did you invent a new name so you could attack me? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Three posts! So if you joined just to get at me, I've won anyway! :lol: :lol: :lol:
What name calling - at least I responded to your post.
If by bait, you mean a post that is both inaccurate and sanctimonious, then yep you lay great bait.
I have not invented a new name, just haven't posted here much before.
Don't flatter yourself by thinking I am trying to get you, as I said before I read the BS you were posting and thought I should correct you.
You responded to my post, yes and thank you for your contribution. And if you read the BS that I've posted and responded, then why haven't you responded to the Kurt Gidley thread.
It's along the same lines and there are many other threads that you have conveniently not posted on. Mickdo and I have been having a friendly banter between us, and we dont completely agree on this issue and neither of us called each other names. If my facts are wrong, I will be the first to admit my mistake. However you seemed to come on and attack me in your FIRST post. How do you expect me to react, say "Thank you, oh perfect one. I am so sorry to offend you."?
If you can't be civil, then don't respond to posts.
Oh thats right you don't respond to posts. Only this one!
P.S. That was sarcasim, not an attack! Just wanted you to know the difference.
P.P.S. As for being sanctimonious, there are far worse people on this forum than me. Go check out RoosterCoqburn and read some of the crap he writes. Don't see you posting to refute his BS. Or are you just a disgruntaled Roosters fan who doesn't like anything being said about their "beloved" Chickens, like him?
P.P.P.S. That last question doesn't need to be answered.