Fitzgerald v Parramatta

[cv8z]

It's entirely different when the DPP deem it to be in the publics interest and they delve into the bottomless pit of public funds, compared to the Directors of a club litigating with the members (very limited) cash reserves.

I would think its in the club members interests to find out if there has been any improprieties
past or present directors
I'm sure you as a member would like to know this and the outcome of it all

I think we are all entitled to truth

 

[born an eel]

I would think its in the club members interests to find out if there has been any improprieties
past or present directors
I'm sure you as a member would like to know this and the outcome of it all

I think we are all entitled to truth

doesn't trial by media cut it for you :lol:

 

[Gronk]

I would think its in the club members interests to find out if there has been any improprieties
past or present directors
I'm sure you as a member would like to know this and the outcome of it all

I think we are all entitled to truth

I have already stated where I stand on this. Spending $300,000 on legal fees over a matter worth 10% of that makes no commercial sense whatsoever. No other company would make such stupid decisions. Laughable that they treat members funds like Monopoly money.

 

[Jodeci]

Jodeci you might say he's a nice bloke, but he leaves a trail of controversy wherever he goes. Nothing to do with Magnay.

Dramas at Cronulla
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/n...h-for-a-new-club/story-e6frfgbo-1225812927883

Dramas at NSW SoO Camp
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/delmege-out-with-sex-shop-con/story-e6freye0-1225715216916

Dramas at Manly
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...e-of-origin-camp/story-e6frexv9-1226057816718

Like I said, dont read the papers

you have to know the bloke

he is a die hard footy fan like us

 

[Jodeci]

from the evidence in Delaney v parramatta leagues at fairwork australia, the club argued that a club up to 20 kms away was seen as a competitor. With the clubs being 12.9KM apart they are a competitor.

We are completely different

 

[cv8z]

I have already stated where I stand on this. Spending $300,000 on legal fees over a matter worth 10% of that makes no commercial sense whatsoever. No other company would make such stupid decisions. Laughable that they treat members funds like Monopoly money.

what if DF is ordered to pay costs?

 

[Jodeci]

I have been to the LaPiazza. It's identical. The same tapas, The same pizzas, the same concept. Just re-branded. Don't be naive to think that Libertini doesn't benefit from this transaction.

Yep, he is gonna take the money and run

 

[Gronk]

what if DF is ordered to pay costs?

What if he isn't ? Will the Directors take full responsibility ?

 

[ParraAds]

Like I said, dont read the papers

you have to know the bloke

he is a die hard footy fan like us

Must be a good bloke then.

 

[cv8z]

What if he isn't ? Will the Directors take full responsibility ?

You'll have to ask them that tomorrow if you intend to vote
I cant comment on what you would like them to do only whats been done and so far & i have no issue with them pursuing it

 

[Twizzle]

Like I said, dont read the papers

you have to know the bloke

he is a die hard footy fan like us

so his being like us is a compliment ? :crazy:

 

[TheParraboy]

so his being like us is a compliment ? :crazy:

we are all outstanding individual citizens

 

[Tony Bongo]

It's owned by the Club Gronk

No 3rd party owners

All profits go back into the club

Tingha is a bit different

Is it? Who set up the Tingah Palace arrangement?
I think from now on I will be eating where 100% of the profits go back to the club.

 

[SDM]

Is it? Who set up the Tingah Palace arrangement?
I think from now on I will be eating where 100% of the profits go back to the club.

Stuff that, the food at Tingha is awesome

 

[Tony Bongo]

I have been to the LaPiazza. It's identical. The same tapas, The same pizzas, the same concept. Just re-branded. Don't be naive to think that Libertini doesn't benefit from this transaction.

Don't be naive to assume he does.

 

[Jodeci]

Is it? Who set up the Tingah Palace arrangement?
I think from now on I will be eating where 100% of the profits go back to the club.

I may be wrong but I think they pay a lease and also contribute a certain percentage of sales as well

I could be wrong

 

[cv8z]

I may be wrong but I think they pay a lease and also contribute a certain percentage of sales as well

I could be wrong

and i also think drinks go to the club
every club needs a chinese restaurant, we lucky its a pretty good one

 

[Tony Bongo]

Stuff that, the food at Tingha is awesome

I agree and I eat there often. It was intended as a tongue in cheek remark.

 

[parra pete]

we are all outstanding individual citizens

So TPB, you think we are ALL individuals...I'm not...:lol:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQqq3e03EBQ

 

[Ollie Webb]

I have already stated where I stand on this. Spending $300,000 on legal fees over a matter worth 10% of that makes no commercial sense whatsoever. No other company would make such stupid decisions. Laughable that they treat members funds like Monopoly money.

Agree spending $300k on legals for the $50k bill is not a great decision but you have to admit recommending $2M expenditure on Aristocrat software when the recommendation from your IT Manager is to not proceed and the CEO ignores the advice and to top it off does not declare his personal interest, well that is really treating members funds with contempt or as you put it like monopoly money.

I know which decision was more frugal and responsible.