I'd like to state that this thread is stupid. What percentage of people here have seen or researched enough about players from prior to the 80's to be able to make a judgement?
Hence why Johns, Langer & Stuart will score highly.
Not saying they don't deserve the praise, but despite the intentions of the poll, the audience participating means it is skewed towards modern players excessively.
Also, many could comfortably argue that it required a unique skill to create with only the 5m rule.
Compare like with like. Go by decades, not over 60 years.
Completely stupid poll