taipan said:DonBilly said:Well I think he didn't really care about Rugby in general. Culturaly he was from the Catholic Bourgeoisie so I guess he would have been more in favour of Union.
Otherwise you are right I don't think he was in favour of the local particularism...
If de Gaulle really cared about RL,he would not have agreed or allowed the league assets to be retained by the rugby union in 1946.These assets were seized in december 1941 by the Vichy government.Also where did 300,000 francs the rugby league had in their bank account prior to the seizure ?.
The Vichy govt ,the French rugby union officials who gave moral support in the seizure,and de Gaulle have nothing to be proud about in this act of plain theft/appropriation. i have nothoing but disdain for the lot of them.
Was he aware of what happened anyway? Even if he was aware, don't you think that keeping things in perspective having Bousquet or Papon back in the administration, or ignoring most of the collaboration of the French Industry bosses/owners masked what happened to RL.
I don't mean that this must be forgotten but that these were very troubled years and in my view De Gaulle is not especially guilty far less in all cases than the head of the FFR and the ministers of the Vichy regime.