The tide is turning - we have far more viable expansion options on the table now than AFL do, and with that comes the opportunity to lobby hard for stadium upgrades to accommodate expansion - and that includes expanding Suncorp for the derbies in SE-Queensland (especially if one more team - likely Brisbane Easts-led - is added later on)I rarely post about AFL but it would be great if the tassie team gets the arse and we announce team 18 around the same time.
They'd need to pluck out a few seats at the turns and for the start of the straight for sure. I have no idea how they'd do it and wish I was an engineer or had any idea of costs, but maybe a symmetrical lower bowl and a third tier on the east and west sides would be a hell of a lot cheaper than a full rebuild. Would end up a monstrosity though.how much work would realistically be needed to get the Gabba up to scratch including the athletics track? It’s possible a new stadium would be less.
Brisbane may not be an exciting global city but its the major population centre of QLD and lets face it, Australia would be a unappealing wasteland if not for the Queensland coast.It is really not a good look for the Olympics that the Olympics are being held in Brisbane at all.
That’s a good oneBrisbane may not be an exciting global city but its the major population centre of QLD and lets face it, Australia would be an unappealing wasteland if not for the Queensland coast.
That doesn't really amount to much if the NRL continues to ignore the most viable and important of those expansion options. The AFL execs must be pissing themselves with laughter at the prospect of a PNG side and the Anywhere Bears, and frankly I doubt they could care less about another NZ side.The tide is turning - we have far more viable expansion options on the table now than AFL do, and with that comes the opportunity to lobby hard for stadium upgrades to accommodate expansion - and that includes expanding Suncorp for the derbies in SE-Queensland (especially if one more team - likely Brisbane Easts-led - is added later on)
Yeh they saw how Wellington had no interest in their game and gave upThat doesn't really amount to much if the NRL continues to ignore the most viable and important of those expansion options. The AFL execs must be pissing themselves with laughter at the prospect of a PNG side and the Anywhere Bears, and frankly I doubt they could care less about another NZ side.
Meanwhile they'll just keep on keeping on, ever so slowly building in the northern states, and consolidating in the rest of the country.
Yep those 300k. Samoans and Tongans will be worth so much to the nrl if we convert them from union lolYeh they saw how Wellington had no interest in their game and gave up
meanwhile the nrl is taking over the South Pacific
That’s 300k more foreigners than the fumblers have ever converted lolYep those 300k. Samoans and Tongans will be worth so much to the nrl if we convert them from union lol
playing tests not in their country is bound to succeed.
Only an afl stooge would take this at a fiscal value. The cultural significance of capturing the South Pacific is immense considering 45% of NRL players are Pacifica or Maori (48% in the NRLW) heritage. Get the virtually untapped Pacific (Tongans, Samoans, Fijians etc) playing league over union and you get an influx of player talent.Yep those 300k. Samoans and Tongans will be worth so much to the nrl if we convert them from union lol
playing tests not in their country is bound to succeed.
Happy head strikes againYep those 300k. Samoans and Tongans will be worth so much to the nrl if we convert them from union lol
playing tests not in their country is bound to succeed.
AFL casual racism.Yep those 300k. Samoans and Tongans will be worth so much to the nrl if we convert them from union lol
playing tests not in their country is bound to succeed.
ExactlyAFL casual racism.
You're using a very strange definition of untapped when some of those islands top exports are Union players lol.Only an afl stooge would take this at a fiscal value. The cultural significance of capturing the South Pacific is immense considering 45% of NRL players are Pacifica or Maori (48% in the NRLW) heritage. Get the virtually untapped Pacific (Tongans, Samoans, Fijians etc) playing league over union and you get an influx of player talent.
As you like reminding people, this is a future stadiums thread try to stay on topic.
I've told you before: 1 sentence replies only please. I don't read dross.You're using a very strange definition of untapped when some of those islands top exports are Union players lol.
Besides, increasing player development in the islands won't mean dick if the NRL can't stop the decline in male participation and development here in Australia. Frankly, the shift in focus in the last 20 years towards poaching failed union talent from NZ and PIs on the cheap is a significant part of the reason why that decline in the local grassroots has happened in the first place, and that tactic hasn't worked out great for RU in this country either.
Samoa knocked England out of the World Cup.Yep those 300k. Samoans and Tongans will be worth so much to the nrl if we convert them from union lol
playing tests not in their country is bound to succeed.
Yeah i think PRs issue isn't that its Samoa, its a bunch of Mt.Druitt born Samoans representing the small island of Samoa...Samoa knocked England out of the World Cup.
Australian/New Zealand raised Samoans knocking England out of the RLWC is a sad indictment on the quality of the RFL.Yeah i think PRs issue isn't that its Samoa, its a bunch of Mt.Druitt born Samoans representing the small island of Samoa...
Its basically your version of clubland Melbourne storm, not having any juniors, so to bring RL there is useless, need to just ensure that Western Sydney is well represented, or basically anywhere there is a heavily populated area of P.I background families