I think a 100% drip line would be impossible without a complete rebuild. It’d simply require too much unsupported roof extension from the current structure.
Put the roof on ANZ as originally designed and planned
I think a 100% drip line would be impossible without a complete rebuild. It’d simply require too much unsupported roof extension from the current structure.
Put the roof on ANZ as originally designed and planned
That number was not accurate. That was just for exit signage and associated electric works.
The austere renovation number was actually $130m. Which is an awful lot of money to put lipstick on a pig.
You’re missing the point as to why it’s important to do them simultaneously.
If you do one, and do it properly, it takes 2-3 years. By which time we’re headed towards another election and you’ve just spent a billion dollars on a stadium. At that point it becomes far more politically expedient to do the absolute bare minimum on the other and call it a day.
This is a once in fifty year investment in Sydney sports infrastructure. Do it properly.
End of this yearWhen is the work on ANZ due to start?
I agree on the long term investment part.
I'd imagine the Parra 2.0 stadium could pick up some of the workload. Would help if Roosters brought a few more games to the Central Coast stadium as well.Yeah it’s gonna be a bit of an issue if both ANZ and Allianz are out simultaneously. Especially with the SCG as it is.
I'd imagine the Parra 2.0 stadium could pick up some of the workload. Would help if Roosters brought a few more games to the Central Coast stadium as well.
this article is just Lancini playing games to get what he wants.
If we gotta spend $15mil for it by ourselves and then make it a bit more austere, so be it. The pics i’ve seen of it are a bit over the top and could surely be scaled back a bit.
You mean the current design could be fitted with a full roof?
Yeah it’s gonna be a bit of an issue if both ANZ and Allianz are out simultaneously. Especially with the SCG as it is.
This is an idea that would probably either be a big success or huge fail, but either way would be interesting (its also slightly of topic but relevant to the discussions above)
If theres going to be a few homeless teams for a year, would it be possible and all that bad if that team decided to temporarily "relocate" to an expansion area for a year to "test the waters" for the NRL (with a fair bit of money thrown in)
eg: Souths don't really have a stand out option of Sydney stadiums, so they decide to set up camp in Perth for a year? or even 50/50 with another area
If they managed a half decent crowd average for the year, then thats surely a sign that a new club actually representing the area would be successful?
SFS will take 4 years to rebuild while ANZ build starts at seasons end for 2 years
Yes - as quoted from the structural engineer who built the ANZ arches & temp stands
The arches were designed to support a retractable rolling up roof. It was one of the reasons for the removal of the temp stands in the first place
Even if they do the lower bowl redesign and bring in the north and south end seating etc
You haven't changed the roof structure
I would rather not spend money on adjysting the drip line but focus those funds on the retractable roof
Nsw election actually a bad outcome for stadiums imo. Much better if we had ended up with 35k allianz, no scg trust and anz put on hold until money available for complete demolition and rebuild.
Wou,d have been nice to see a GF in Perth as well