With 4 years guaranteed, Stuart Ayres could easily change his mind as sports minister and allow for the full rebuild to occur.
ANZ was originally built to have a roof put on it at a later date.You mean the current design could be fitted with a full roof?
This is an idea that would probably either be a big success or huge fail, but either way would be interesting (its also slightly of topic but relevant to the discussions above)
If theres going to be a few homeless teams for a year, would it be possible and all that bad if that team decided to temporarily "relocate" to an expansion area for a year to "test the waters" for the NRL (with a fair bit of money thrown in)
eg: Souths don't really have a stand out option of Sydney stadiums, so they decide to set up camp in Perth for a year? or even 50/50 with another area
If they managed a half decent crowd average for the year, then thats surely a sign that a new club actually representing the area would be successful?
WSS will be too small to play Easter Monday clash between the two top teams of the NRL
I always said it was poor scheduling. Should of been a poorer drawing team
Good chance the NSW govt asked for a big game, more TV viewers allows them to sell their stadium achievement.
Anyone got a pic or concept art of what ANZ is going to look like?
Anyone got a pic or concept art of what ANZ is going to look like?
Well, in that case, we only need a 60k stadium. I think that would be ideal
yeah, this is what the latest version is going to look like......
Yes. Do it properly. And wait so we arent forced to use the shithole that is the SCG when you can already see that it cant even handle the SFS overflow.You’re missing the point as to why it’s important to do them simultaneously.
If you do one, and do it properly, it takes 2-3 years. By which time we’re headed towards another election and you’ve just spent a billion dollars on a stadium. At that point it becomes far more politically expedient to do the absolute bare minimum on the other and call it a day.
This is a once in fifty year investment in Sydney sports infrastructure. Do it properly.
Yes. Do it properly. And wait so we arent forced to use the shithole that is the SCG when you can already see that it cant even handle the SFS overflow.
Which Will. Not. Happen.
If they do one properly and it takes three years, they won't do anything to the other beyond a new coat of paint.
There’s significant overhang of the roof on the outside, unlike what it was at the SFS. I heard it explained that they had to leave it open as there was nowhere else air flow.
You are wrong.
No rain elements will enter Bankwest from behind the top decks. The overhang of the rear of the upper level is large enough to prevent rain incursion - unless of course we have a Cat 5 cyclone.
This has been discussed many times before.
Allianz is going to need more than $18m, the roof is half demolished.
The only thing that might happen is a reduction in the spend on it, but it's being rebuilt.
One other factor could be a cabinet reshuffle.