Canard
Immortal
- Messages
- 35,609
According to BankWest stadium they won’t be selling these seats.
It's not sold for "events"? What's it for then??
According to BankWest stadium they won’t be selling these seats.
It's not sold for "events"? What's it for then??
Is that seat associated with standing seats for the soccer, or part of some other event space?
Makes you wonder why they installed seats behind a concrete wall.
I read an article a few months back about how Sydney and Melbourne were both a a point in their development that they had to choose what type of city they would be
It basically said there was 3 types of "large" city based on how they contain their population
1. New York - A huge CBD
2. London - many smaller CBD's
3. LA - a small/medium CBD and lots of urban sprawl
It insinuated that Sydney was going the path of LA, which was probably right, but I'd say with Parramatta being developed its trying to follow the London model
Melbourne was closer to the NY model with the crazy amount of development, especially skyscrapers, going on in the CBD, but it's sprawl is still growing by a fair bit as well
Isn't that an "event"?Might be ok for a concert or something.
Isn't that an "event"?
I can see Bankwest, the new SFS and ANZ( whenever)
giving a huge boost to NRL and A league crowds ,and even Union.
It just bugs me ,we haven't had these bells and whistle stadiums in place years ago.We wouldn't be whining about crowds .
Govt's/sport administrators of the past in Sydney need to hang their heads in shame.
Depends who is singing.
Well it certainly takes a way a big excuse we have been using. Time will tell if it is the panacea we ae hoping for to sub 15k crowds. It is long overdue, in part because clubs have, and many still do, rely on pokies to bail them out rather than having to grow their customer base, and the NRL's reluctance to set any min criteria.
The code has to be consistent with criteria, they can't be seen to push down harder on Sydney clubs, than current interstate clubs.
.
My criteria comment was more to do with min stadium standards rather than attendance levels. If the NRL set these it would have benefited all clubs as they would have had to sort out their facilities or moved to centralised ones in the same way it has in UK. It would also help with expansion clubs eg Perth get Bankwest Park finished off.
eg
Min 25k capacity
Min 80% seating
Min 75% undercover
Min female toilet facilities
etc etc
Couldn't argue with that set of standards.Especially in this day and age, when females are becoming more interested in the game.
The only thing I would add, clubs who at present have less than those figures, be given a decent lead in time(ie at least an additional 5 years from the end of the next TV deal) to get to these levels.
We've kind of known that for a while though, haven't we?
Not taking a shot at you here - but do you really think five years would be enough for Brookvale, Shark Park, Kogarah, etc to get up to scratch?
We've kind of known that for a while though, haven't we?
Not taking a shot at you here - but do you really think five years would be enough for Brookvale, Shark Park, Kogarah, etc to get up to scratch?
5 years additional on top of the next 5 year Tv deal=10 years IOW from 2023-2033
5 years only ,Buckley's chance.
Maybe that time framework could come down.
If the criteria is laid out end 2020, that's an additional 2 years remaining on the current TV deals.
Minimum 10 years up to 12 years to get ones sh*t together, surely is reasonable to seek co tenants/Govt grants/private enterprise secure funding ,when some infrastructure already in place..
Think it will be narrowed down to Brookvale/Shark Park/Penrith.
Possibly 20,000 all seaters realistically have a better chance than 25,000 from a cost perspective and the restrictions of their locations.And in 2 cases council input.
The Sharks new Leagues club supposedly will be operational 2021 and the retail centre I guess 2022.Leagues club should be reaping far bigger revenue and profits as a result.A bigger capacity stadium will be financially beneficial to the Leagues club, with more game attendees using that facility.
And if they grab A Southern A League franchise as a co tenant, that's a further possible option.
Couldn't argue with that set of standards.Especially in this day and age, when females are becoming more interested in the game.
The only thing I would add, clubs who at present have less than those figures, be given a decent lead in time(ie at least an additional 5 years from the end of the next TV deal) to get to these levels.