I’d only count on the Souths one as being a safe bet long term- Tigers will need to upgrade their grounds to keep using them and the Dogs need a brand new ground
They would make that up easilyApparently there's currently a $2m gap between the deal being offered to play at Allianz compared to the current deal at Accor. That's a fairly big gap to close but I think a loss between the deals on the face of it will need to be taken and then back themselves to make up the shortfall on higher ticket sales, membership and selling out the corporate boxes.
You could…. But the problem is the view from the upper tiers would always suck for any rectangular game, in rectangular mode you inevitably end up with effectively a single tier stadium with a shallow rake on the lower tier.I’ve always wondered of it would be possible to have a lower bowl that accommodated 25-30k and moved in to to create a genuine rectangular lower bowl set up, then retracted out with some fillers in the corners to create a 60k oval? Wouldn’t be cheap I know but maybe cheaper than spending $400mill on a rectangular stadium? I guess the corporate suites would be an issue?
Got a link for that or is it like your claims of new Cairns and Port Moresby stadiums?Dogs have a development application in state govt for a new stadium plus enabling development via high rise units and retail on their land up there
Which for most club games is fine as it holds 40kYou could…. But the problem is the view from the upper tiers would always suck for any rectangular game, in rectangular mode you inevitably end up with effectively a single tier stadium with a shallow rake on the lower tier.
Lions back 70k-seat Brisbane stadium plan
I doubt there is much substance to this but if it got up all major capitals would have an oval ground as their largest stadium. It would also likely hinder any Suncorp upgrade in the future because “it’s multi-use, big NRL, Union & Soccer games can just be played there”.
AFL/Lions will go hard at it, NRL/Broncos/Dolphins should be doing the same with pushing the more modest Oval option that would leave funds for upgrades to the 30 year old main stadium, Suncorp.
This would be everything that is wrong with the Olympics currently.
If we’re talking about remodelling Accor sure, but I wouldn’t build a stadium from scratch like that. Why build something you know is going to Be a shitty experience for half the crowd at the premiere events?Which for most club games is fine as it holds 40k
I disagree…
keep Suncorp at 50k (perfect for 90% of games) the make the gabba an Accor-style behemoth with moveable stands for rectangular games
then we would just be looking at Origin and GFs for that (a 70k capacity would be grea!)
From what I’ve seen the moveable stands almost always cause problems with either being expensive to maintain and keep operational or damaging the pitch. Most of the stadiums end up getting locked into one mode or the other to save on costs, and for the reasons I stated above the view from the fixed upper tiers is always average for rectangular sports due to the distance they have to be from the pitch.The USA pioneered multi use stadiums in the 1960's with movable stands, etc to ground share between NFL and baseball.
They never built another one once these stadiums aged out.
MLB elected to have smaller, purpose built stadiums.
NFL built palaces for (their) sport. Everyone is happy.
No one, anywhere in the world, is happy with multi purpose stadiums