I'm of the view that we still need to keep him for the length of the contract. I don't care if we play him in reserve grade, and his form says he should be. But it is more making sure that our rivals don't benefit from screwing us over again.
Not that it can be proved but there has clearly been breaches of the anti tampering rules as Galvin is locked up until the end of 2026. Parra have form in this with M Moses and Matterson previously which we folded on and they instantly improved their side. But we when recruited Stefano he would of improved us but they played him in reserve grade all year despite the fact he would of started and improved us.
Now look at Parra for next year. If they recruit Galvin to play alongside Moses next year, more than likely they will be competing for one of the 6-8 spots in the top 8 which we will also hopefully be competing for. But if we keep Galvin, they wont be able to recruit another 5/8 since they know whoever is there is just warming a spot. So Moses has to play with a reserve grader or a makeshift 5/8 like D Walker. Add Moses missing a few games and they are likely stuck at the bottom of the table.
Why would we help Parra to compete for a spot in the finals when keeping Galvin for 350K can prevent that.
At the very minimum we need to keep him all off season and maybe release him just before the June 30 deadline next year to make sure they have the most disruption to their season possible.