We will find out if they learnt the lessons from the Warriors game. Playing a weaker team, weakened by injury. Looking for a dominant defensive performance with the attack flowing from there.
A lot of people refer to this but what about the lessons from the other games. Our team has multi personality disorder.
12-12 at halftime versus Souths. Then go to sleep for 31 minutes
18-12 at HT vs Parra. Only got away with that due to better goalkicking
10-12 at HT vs Raiders. Stayed pretty even and both teams were evenly shit
12-8 in a tight struggle vs Drag Queens. Then they wake up for half 2
26-12 at HT vs Warriors. We all know the Sharks went into hibernation
8-12 at HT vs Roosters. Came out of hibernation to Storm home
The Warriors game was a symptom of a syndrome. We've gone from playing the whole 70 to barely managing 40.
They don't need to score 50 like some say against the 'Dogs. They just need to play 80 and win and keep their score low. Teams don't go out to put cricket score on. If it happens it happens. They go out to run their processes and let the score look after itself. Only morons say a team has to score 50, 60 or 70 for a game to be classed as good. Did a moron say that first?