The effort he made to get there and then get penalised wrongly shows just how much referees have no feel for the game a lot of the time. It wasn't like he sauntered there solely for the purpose of putting the fullback off.
What did you make of those 3 Pappy drop outs in the second half?I just saw the end of the Panthers/Storm highlights.
Literally every bomb that went up had an attacking player go up with the sole intention of batting it back - including the one which lead to the Storm try.
No one making a legitimate attempt to catch the ball.
I honestly don't know what they think at times introducing these kind of rule changes.
Hasnt first grade coaching aged Fitz and Webby. They both looked rugged.
Maim him. Legally, of course. As I have mentioned. The P.O.W. is, as mentioned, a cunova thing.A question on another penalty.
Ronnie I think tackled that piece of work from the Warriors in the air on our goal line and got penalised.
I thought you were allowed to tackle in air in a try scoring situation.
If he hadn't tackled him there the catcher just goes straight to ground and it's a try.
What else was he meant to do
He was probably raging at Ref in the box. That would take it out of him.OMG. Just watched the pressers. Webby in particular looks weathered. Fitz looked drained. Could have been just that game.
Earned the right as Fitzy always saysThat's the thing that stood out for me.
Yes, they were missing tackles but they were in cohesion.
Everyone working for each other.
You miss? No worries, I've got you covered.
Huge improvement in that area.
I did notice Nikora seemingly had a brief to stop AFB.
He seemed to be constantly coming in and chopping his legs out from under him.
Two others up top to wrap up the ball, and it's job done.
All working together.
Solid plan.
He was probably raging at Ref in the box. That would take it out of him.
then again, I guess he didn’t have to watch it
What else could we expect for PVL and the NRL, it would be another rule they came up on a whim.It's not so much a source of confusion to me as a source of something illogical. I've watched all the round one games and the short drop out is a clear contest to have a chaser jump early and tap the ball back, as Kennedy was trying to do. Papenhuyzen's short drop outs all had the chaser jumping at the ball from 8-9 metres out. So much so there was doubt about them touching the ball before the plane or not on every occasion.
The rule is flawed.
They have no idea of the feel of the game I used to ref touch for years actually the Lam's and Hodges for a while.Back to the "tap back" penalty.
What is the definition of too soon? Doesn't nearly every player that junps before attempting a kick defusal go early?
Talk about not having a feel for the game when making rules.
Cam and dale go about there jobs and can be captain with no change.Random question too.. but we have Cam and Dale as co-captains… both played last night, but Nicho attended the presser after the match. What’s that about?
Fitz looked old at 30 I reckonHasnt first grade coaching aged Fitz and Webby. They both looked rugged.
He has looked like a skeleton since 1999Fitz looked old at 30 I reckon
Was all buisness even when Ronnie scored he had a lil clap and straight back in sifa didn’t even flinch, surely with no adjustments in squad they have grown enough mentally to realise we have been lacking in that departmentLeads into another thing I noticed.
As they fought tooth and nail to get back in the game and eventually hit the lead and win. I've noticed after just watching the replay that they had a real steely seriousness about them. Score a try, don't go overboard, steel up, go back and come again. May equate to improved focus. Hope so.