perverse
Referee
- Messages
- 26,530
yeah, i was just sort of following on from what you've said. i agree, living in the now is most often the best course of action... but in 6 or 7 months time, in the "now" we will be able to utilize the services of Beau Henry, and i strongly suggest that we do.Perverse my problem isnt with Gidley going to fullback next season, as i have stated i would prefer 7. henry 1. Gidley. My point is that i can see where the opposing opinions are coming from because what we have now is working well. And i believe Gidley in the halves has to be seen as a success during his current venture there. Whether it is through his own quality or the fact it has helped mullen fire is irrelivent to my point
End of the day i like having two strong combo's to chose from rather than the lesser of two evils (Scotty or Dodge)
he may take a while to warm to first grade, but he's one of those juniors that is worth it... and im confident he can, at the very least, provide an able partner for Mullen, so Mullen and Gids can dominate teams from their respective positions.
.. and as you said, it's beautiful having a strong backup if Henry does flop. i don't think he will, but we've got the Gids at 7 option there if things go pear shaped... or even Dodge, who has played some great footy for us this year too. our winning percentage with Dodge in the team would be pretty good this year, i would think. im not sure there will be another team in the comp as well looked after for depth in the halves as us next year if Henry fires.
so yeah, i'm just rebuking what others have been saying in regards to sticking with Mullen and Gids rather than giving Henry a crack.