Tommy Smith
Referee
- Messages
- 21,344
I'd do away with Golden Point because it disadvantages the Wests Tigers, who are incapable of winning them.
It is also bad for Ben Hunt's mental health.
It is also bad for Ben Hunt's mental health.
It would actually increase the negative play (offsides, holding down etc) as the refs would be even more reluctant to penalise if a send off was part of the consequence.Send someone off every time there is a penalty in ot will stop that
You speak the truth, Tommy.I'd do away with Golden Point because it disadvantages the Wests Tigers, who are incapable of winning them.
It is also bad for Ben Hunt's mental health.
We hardly ever do with the current points structure. Stop trying to bring your stupid ideas into the game. This past weekend was quite an anomaly.If you brought in an optional 3 point play after each try (so conversion worth 2 or you can elect to go for 3 points) you would hardly ever have level scores at end of 80.
Brutal. And I love itGolden Point is like a Golden Shower.
Really good in theory until your on the recieving end of one.........
Isn’t that right Brisbane fans?
We hardly ever do with the current points structure. Stop trying to bring your stupid ideas into the game. This past weekend was quite an anomaly.
Golden point=Turning into Union kick fest.
I'm on board.
4 for a win.
3 for a GP win.
2 for a draw after GP.
1 for a GP loss.
0 for a loss.