What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Gordon buys 50% of stake in STI Dragons

TruSaint

Referee
Messages
20,293
The NRL's two remaining joint venture clubs will have phantom owners by the end of the month, with billionaire Bruce Gordon taking 50 per cent in St George Illawarra and the Magpies moving to 75 per cent equity in Wests Tigers, leaving the Tigers with a name but no equity in the franchise.

The Steelers, who joined the then NSWRL in 1982 and merged with the Dragons at the end of the Super League war, will also have no equity in St George Illawarra – Gordon holding 50 per cent and the Kogarah-based Dragons retaining 50 per cent – but Illawarra will have representation on the board.

The Balmain Tigers, a 1908 foundation club, will nominally exist in Wests Tigers, and their parlous financial state means they are unlikely to raise the $2.7 million to acquire a 25 per cent share of the club and board representation but will be given 5 years to do so.

The official announcement of the restructures, supervised by the NRL's Tony Crawford, will coincide with repayment of debt to the NRL, with Gordon paying between $6 million and $7 million and Wests Ashfield, the Magpies' successful licensed club, paying $2.7 million, which is half the outstanding money owed headquarters.

Wests Ashfield will have control of the board, constitution and all documents, and a veto over any new owner of the remaining quarter of the club.

Private equity of 25 per cent would relieve Wests Ashfield of some responsibility of covering future cost overruns.

Ashfield has also ruled out any possibility of moving to 100 per cent equity, because it would mean rebranding the club as the Wests Magpies and moving to Campbelltown.

Not only would this mean vacating a huge wedge of inner Sydney to the Bulldogs and Eels, it would also disenfranchise a new generation of rugby league fans who have grown up knowing the club only as Wests Tigers.

The Dragons are entitled to boast they have been the only enduring successful joint venture of the three formed at the end of the costly and brutal Super League war when the number of clubs was to be cut initially from 20 to 14.

Unlike the shotgun marriages of Wests Tigers and the short-lived Northern Eagles combination of traditional enemies Norths and Manly, the union of St George and the Steelers was a wedding where each partner had what the other wanted.

St George had history, while Illawarra had geography.

The usually successful Dragons were backed by its Kogarah-based licensed club but surrounded by an increasingly ageing, non-traditional rugby league demographic, while the Steelers had a rich nursery of talent but little money and tradition.

The not-negotiables in the original wedding vows of St George Illawarra – colours (red and white), emblem (Dragons) and location (St George and Wollongong) – will remain. Future decisions on where games are played – Wollongong, Kogarah, Allianz or ANZ stadiums – will be made by the new board.

The Magpies will control where future Wests Tigers games are played but the disappointing crowd at Leichhardt on Sunday, admittedly against Melbourne who drew few supporters, indicate a westward move to Homebush and eventually Campbelltown.

The NRL has set a time frame on the ownership structures of its four debtor clubs – Dragons, Wests Tigers, Knights and Titans – and has dictated all four will be treated the same regarding money owed.

While the Dragons are expected to be the first of the officially-announced new ownership structures, the lawyers working on the Wests Tigers reorganisation will complete details by the end of April.

Wests, the competition's paupers from the late 1970s when Ashfield's annual grant was only $50,000, have been effectively reborn from the late 1950s when it was known as the "millionaire club".

The Dragons, who are now the NRL's only perfect match of private equity and community ownership, can boast they have always looked ahead to the next twist of economic history.

While Souths refused to merge and were banished by the NRL, the Dragons embraced the Steelers and the NRL's $10 million merger dowry and have now followed the Rabbitohs in seeking a rich suitor of similar megabucks to James Packer and Russell Crowe, Souths' new owners.

Gordon's WIN Corporation is one of the most successful media corporations in Australia and the sport of rugby league, once shunned by the top end of town, can now claim some wealthy investors.

It can be argued the Steelers have retreated to their original position as a St George nursery, but the Wollongong club has contributed little finance to the costly operation of an NRL club. However, they will have savvy representation on the new board, and the Steelers administer the highly successful local Illawarra Coal League.

Wests Ashfield subsidises six junior clubs in the traditional Balmain district.

http://www.theage.com.au/rugby-leag...a-dragons-20160419-go9jzs.html?skin=text-only
 

Willow

Assistant Moderator
Messages
108,390
The Steelers, who joined the then NSWRL in 1982 and merged with the Dragons at the end of the Super League war, will also have no equity in St George Illawarra – Gordon holding 50 per cent and the Kogarah-based Dragons retaining 50 per cent – but Illawarra will have representation on the board.
So in financial terms at least, the Illawarra Steelers are no longer part of the joint venture. Not that there was ever any money coming from them anyway, but it does seem that they have been bought out.

And I understand the 'representation on the board' is a single seat in a non-voting capacity. Happy to be corrected on that.
 

TruSaint

Referee
Messages
20,293
So in financial terms at least, the Illawarra Steelers are no longer part of the joint venture. Not that there was ever any money coming from them anyway, but it does seem that they have been bought out.

And I understand the 'representation on the board' is a single seat in a non-voting capacity. Happy to be corrected on that.

Thats the way i read it as well.
 
Messages
17,055
Gordon will want games played in the Illawarra that is a given if not i don't see him putting his money into the club.
 
Messages
3,622
Gordon will want games played in the Illawarra that is a given if not i don't see him putting his money into the club.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Illawarra Steelers no longer a JV participant, purely an observer.

Rich Media family seeking to keep Football in Wollongong, quite possibly.

Can't see all games going to Wollongong given the original arrangement of 50/50 split of games.

More likely Gordon family will want to grow the "brand" to enhance its value.

This can only happen if the JV has a successful team.

Looking forward to the announcement as we can expect to have successful business people attempting to run the JV as a successful business.

As always the devil will be in the detail.
 

Dragonslayer

First Grade
Messages
7,705
The Steelers, who joined the then NSWRL in 1982 and merged with the Dragons at the end of the Super League war, will also have no equity in St George Illawarra – Gordon holding 50 per cent and the Kogarah-based Dragons retaining 50 per cent – but Illawarra will have representation on the board.

The official announcement of the restructures, supervised by the NRL's Tony Crawford, will coincide with repayment of debt to the NRL, with Gordon paying between $6 million and $7 million.

The Dragons are entitled to boast they have been the only enduring successful joint venture of the three formed at the end of the costly and brutal Super League war when the number of clubs was to be cut initially from 20 to 14.

St George had history, while Illawarra had geography.

The usually successful Dragons were backed by its Kogarah-based licensed club but surrounded by an increasingly ageing, non-traditional rugby league demographic, while the Steelers had a rich nursery of talent but little money and tradition.

The not-negotiables in the original wedding vows of St George Illawarra – colours (red and white), emblem (Dragons) and location (St George and Wollongong) – will remain.
[/B] Future decisions on where games are played – Wollongong, Kogarah, Allianz or ANZ stadiums – will be made by the new board.

While the Dragons are expected to be the first of the officially-announced new ownership structures, the lawyers working on the Wests Tigers reorganisation will complete details by the end of April.

The Dragons, who are now the NRL's only perfect match of private equity and community ownership, can boast they have always looked ahead to the next twist of economic history.

Gordon's WIN Corporation is one of the most successful media corporations in Australia and the sport of rugby league, once shunned by the top end of town, can now claim some wealthy investors.

It can be argued the Steelers have retreated to their original position as a St George nursery, but the Wollongong club has contributed little finance to the costly operation of an NRL club. However, they will have savvy representation on the new board, and the Steelers administer the highly successful local Illawarra Coal League.


http://www.theage.com.au/rugby-leag...a-dragons-20160419-go9jzs.html?skin=text-only

Highlighted in black seem to indicate that there will be a NEW board, which is long overdue and hopefully come up with some strategic planning for the success of the club.

Point in blue is to indicate that wealthy investors could equal increased TPA's to attract quality players to the club and help finance our juniors.
 

Get2dachopper!

Juniors
Messages
1,656
As long as St.George have 50% control of the joint venture, that's all I was worried about. I didn't want a Tinkler debacle at the Dragons. The worst case scenario, as I see, if it doesn't work out, Gordon and the Steelers go it alone as will the Dragons.

But looking at the positives, thank goodness we will now at least be on a level playing field with the rich clubs. As for the split in home games? Who knows, playing at ANZ may not be an issue now, seeing this guy is a billionaire, maybe we will just play out of Kogarah and Wollongong.
 

TruSaint

Referee
Messages
20,293
As long as St.George have 50% control of the joint venture, that's all I was worried about. I didn't want a Tinkler debacle at the Dragons. The worst case scenario, as I see, if it doesn't work out, Gordon and the Steelers go it alone as will the Dragons.

But looking at the positives, thank goodness we will now at least be on a level playing field with the rich clubs. As for the split in home games? Who knows, playing at ANZ may not be an issue now, seeing this guy is a billionaire, maybe we will just play out of Kogarah and Wollongong.

As coast said, e has an affiliation with his region , so it maybe that our home grounds are protected to some degree, but he is also a business man. If money can be made from the bigger venues, then he needs to protect his investment.
 
Messages
3,622
As long as St.George have 50% control of the joint venture, that's all I was worried about. I didn't want a Tinkler debacle at the Dragons. The worst case scenario, as I see, if it doesn't work out, Gordon and the Steelers go it alone as will the Dragons.

But looking at the positives, thank goodness we will now at least be on a level playing field with the rich clubs. As for the split in home games? Who knows, playing at ANZ may not be an issue now, seeing this guy is a billionaire, maybe we will just play out of Kogarah and Wollongong.

We can expect him to look at all aspects of the home games issues.

Would love to see him take a hard stance with Kogarah Council and renegotiate the current ground lease to a financially viable figure. It is the club that managed to obtain NSW and Federal government funding to improve jubilee oval which in turn benefited the area.
 

Jubileeboy

First Grade
Messages
9,259
We can expect him to look at all aspects of the home games issues.

Would love to see him take a hard stance with Kogarah Council and renegotiate the current ground lease to a financially viable figure. It is the club that managed to obtain NSW and Federal government funding to improve jubilee oval which in turn benefited the area.

Great post. Well said mate.
Kogarah council has a lot to answer for.
 

Willow

Assistant Moderator
Messages
108,390
Doesn't St George owe a shirt load of money to Kogarah Council in rental arrears?
 

Willow

Assistant Moderator
Messages
108,390
I don't know. I tried that once when I was renting a property but the landlord stood his ground. Most unreasonable of him.
 

Blood Shot Eyes

First Grade
Messages
6,043
As coast said, e has an affiliation with his region , so it maybe that our home grounds are protected to some degree, but he is also a business man. If money can be made from the bigger venues, then he needs to protect his investment.

Billionaire business man hey Tru........ you watch Wayne will be back soon :D
 
Messages
3,622
I don't know. I tried that once when I was renting a property but the landlord stood his ground. Most unreasonable of him.

Difference here Willow is that there are virtually no other tenants willing to occupy Kogarah Oval.

Only possibility would be Sydney FC, and the chances of that happening are about as strong as the North Sydney Bears being awarded an NRL licence in South Australia
 

Willow

Assistant Moderator
Messages
108,390
The point being that Kogarah Council has always received rent for Jubilee Oval. Up until recently, it was an agreement that was honoured by the Club.

The Oval essentially belongs to the rate payers. If the rent remains unpaid, it is the ratepayers who will foot the bill.

Of course you speak of business and the law of the jungle, and I can understand that.

But let's make not make out that Kogarah Council have done the wrong thing in this regard. The landlords didn't chuck us out despite being owed $.
 

Latest posts

Top