That’s exactly what I said though if you really want to critically analyse. I said they are both washed up (i.e. they are nowhere near as popular as they used to be) yet one is more washed up than the other.
If you wish to refute that can you name anything either of them have done in the past say 10 years? The last thing that I know Robbie Williams has done that was remotely popular was that god awful duet he did with Nicole Kidman and that would have been what 15 years ago? More than that probably
It’s semantics about what washed up means i suppose. If you can get 20k to a concert it wouldn’t be my definition. Sure he’s not making hits for this generation but that doesn’t mean he’s irrelevant. Would you call U2 washed up even though they play to sold out big stadiums still?
Given the likely age of attendees at the gf I would think a former big international star from the 90’s/2000’s would be a reasonable target for the money you want to spend.
macklemore was great at the gf i was at and worth staying in your seat for. I’d be very happy to see Robbie Williams and no doubt the wife will drag me to his concert in perth next year.
Jimmy barnes? Errr not so much lol.
leaving all that aside and let’s be honest for 10mins of a GF it doesn’t make any earth shattering difference, it is still a reinforcement for perception.
Robbie Williams v jimmy barnes two very different perceptions created.