Hayne must be Suspended

[Evolution]

So from now on I can expect no one to cry about anything a storm player does in regards to a chicken wing or feet first tackle?

Last year people were going on and on about Billys sliding having the potential to cause injury and he should be stopped now a player actually hurts another with a very similar technique and you all are falling over yourselves to say it is not worthy of suspension.

It either is or is not acceptable and the next game being a grand final should have nothing to do with how the charge is graded.

 

[parra-matters]

feet 1st is a different story mate

 

[Evolution]

feet 1st is a different story mate

Both result in the same potential for injury so I fail to see how it is different.

Also according to the results of grading the NRL thinks dropping you knees onto a player is worse than sliding into them feet first.

Lucky for you the NRL chose to charge him with the easy option.

 

[Glenn]

Burt had scored the try & was facing away from Gibbs. Hayne was contesting a loose ball. The difference is like night & day, I don't understand why people think there is an issue here.

High profile player, tall poppy syndrome. :roll:

 

[The Colonel]

As would Cam Smith

The only thing Cam Smith did wrong was take the guilty plea for a charge earlier in the year as opposed to fighting it - he himself stated that he should have and he probably would have gotten off.

Both Hayne and Smith received grade one charges - Smith had carryover points, Hayne didn't.

 

[caylo]

The only thing Cam Smith did wrong was take the guilty plea for a charge earlier in the year as opposed to fighting it - he himself stated that he should have and he probably would have gotten off.

Both Hayne and Smith received grade one charges - Smith had carryover points, Hayne didn't.

not only that but had an increase in loading of points because of previous charges...