No he didn't!! We made the finals 3 times in the 4 years after he left. We also had good depth in the following years - Think we won a few NSW cup GF plus we also made an under 20's GF. This is all because Smith and his brains trust had a "whole" club approach.
So was Hagan / Anderson responsible for building our squad / depth in 2007-2009 ? Or was it some forward planning?
Then Hagan took over and didn't really look after the juniors pathway followed by another 2 years of Anderson. Then everyone was amazed that in 2011 Kearney (yeah he made mistakes but it wasn't all his fault) couldn't get a shit squad to the finals!!
The biggest f**k up (in my opinion) was not appointing Taylor instead on Hagan.
Interestingly Hagan / Anderson (moved on from both of his post NRL coaching jobs) has never had another NRL coaching gig after leaving us. Taylor is onto his second NRL coaching job, while Smith also had 2 other jobs (both with the task of rebuilding), he also made another GF.
The Knights made the finals after Smith left the club. And the year after smith left the Roosters they won the GF (and minor premiers a few times too). So it appears Smith does leave clubs in a pretty good shape (I agree he does choke in big games but).
I reckon Smith left the first grade squad a demoralised and unmotivated rabble. I think it is a testament to Hagan that he could get them to play at all. But that's just my opinion and doesn't really matter. I also think that if we had appointed Jason Taylor, he would have been sacked after a couple of years like all the others if he didn't magically turn the club's fortunes around in a short space of time. Like I said, I think there were multiple factors at play, and to try to blame a couple of players or coaches is silly. Whilst I never liked Brian Smith, I don't blame him soley for our downfall; he was just one of a number of factors that perpetuated each other.