Hollywood Jesus
Coach
- Messages
- 11,677
mate, im a scientist. thats how i look at things. sorry if it's different to your outlook on life.
the fact remains that people have trouble viewing situations when they have an emotional connection.
Second section, true. First section, so what? Like I said, this isn't a slanging match, but the "I'm Mr. Objectivity" is such a load of crap. Just because you're a scientist doesn't in any way mean you have an ability to be more objective or be more informed about football than anyone else. I live my life by a rational, objective approach, but that doesn't mean I'm any more qualified to judge football than anyone else.
My stylish beard and ridiculously insane levels of handsomeness give me that qualification.
In all seriousness HJ, he may not be in form but even you must concede that at their best Hayne is a better fullback then Burt.
I admit however that the article paints him as a bit of a sook.
It does, indeed.
But no, I still disagree. Burt is better at talking and positioning the line and, when in form, supports up the middle of the ruck better. Hayne runs back harder, but so what?
In the best of form, I'd pick Burt over Hayne still.
I'm a little over Jarryd, and thats not an opinion from reading the article... I've been over him for most of the year
Same.
My personal opinion is that he is an over-rated player who held us to ransom for too much money based on a short period of form when Taylor put him in. I see him as an arrogant and egotistical player, prone to having a sook if things don't go his way, who dives like a dog whenever the opportunity arrives and who would walk away from this Club the second he wasn't bowed down to.