What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

How do The Wallabies try and stop Ritchie?

Iafeta

Referee
Messages
24,357
gunnamatta bay said:
Its a cronulla forum joke

Well I've heard it all. If you're the joke of the Cronulla forum your stocks have nosedived to skeepe proportions.
 
Messages
4,051
Lote lucky he's not in NRL: McCallum


Tuesday, August 22, 2006

LOTE Tuqiri's spear tackle on All Black Richie McCaw would be considered so serious in the NRL he would have almost certainly been referred directly to the judiciary on an ungraded charge and be facing a ban of more than 10 matches.

Tuqiri was outed for 11 weeks but will miss just one match, the September 9 Test against South Africa, as he was due to be rested from the Australian Provincial Championship and would have been unlikely to play in the opening game of the end-of-season tour of Europe.

NRL chief match reviewer Greg McCallum said yesterday the tackle was worse than any he had seen in three years in the job and suggested Tuqiri would have received a longer ban than the 10 matches imposed in the past two seasons on Souths' Luke MacDougall and Rooster Lopini Paea.

"Each of those were grade fives but in this case there would be an argument for it to be sent straight through to the judiciary on the basis that each of the criteria we look for was met in terms of danger," he said. "We look at a number of factors - the lifting element, the way the player is put into a dangerous position, the landing and any injury … In this case it appeared that there was some significant contact. It was certainly worse than the Paea incident in terms of landing because McCaw's neck is hyper-extended and his head skims across the ground."

Brad Walter

from rugby heaven
 

ozbash

Referee
Messages
26,922
PM Weighs In: McCaw 'Assaulted' www.xtra.co.nz

New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark weighed into a row following Saturday's bruising Tri Nations rugby encounter in Auckland, saying Australia were guilty of "acts of assault" on All Blacks skipper Richie McCaw.

New Zealand clinched the Philips Tri Nations title and completed a season 3-0 sweep of the Australians with the 34-27 victory at Eden Park but the match will be more remembered for its physical nature, highlighted by Lote Tuqiri's spear tackle on McCaw.

Wallaby winger Tuqiri was cited and then banned for 11 weeks for the heart-stopping 44th-minute incident in which McCaw was upended and left clutching his neck after his head struck the ground.

Tuqiri denied any malice and was indignant over his suspension, while McCaw suffered no long-term damage. But the ferocity of that tackle and other challenges on the All Blacks skipper angered the Kiwi PM.

"I thought it was absolutely appalling. We witnessed several acts of assault against the All Blacks captain and it was very, very ugly to see," she told New Zealand radio.

"One hesitates as just someone in the stand to voice an opinion but certainly I felt someone should have been sent off."

New Zealand coach Graham Henry had claimed on Sunday the Wallabies had deliberately targeted McCaw after his imperious back-row performances in the previous Tri Nations victories in Christchurch and Brisbane.

It is not the first time a New Zealand premier has shunned diplomatic niceties to comment on Trans-Tasman sporting incidents.

Prime Minister Robert Muldoon commented following a one-day cricket match at the Melbourne Cricket Ground in 1981 when the Kiwis needed six off the final ball for victory.

Australian skipper Greg Chappell instructed his brother Trevor to bowl the final delivery underarm to prevent New Zealand number 10 batsman Brian McKechnie having any chance of hitting the winning runs.

"It was an act of cowardice," Muldoon said. "I consider it appropriate that the Australian team were wearing yellow."
 

Iafeta

Referee
Messages
24,357
Even Jake White thought the Aussies were over the top.

Jake "My guys knee blokes to the head and rip eyeballs" White FFS!

What say you skeepe? Still ripped off, biatch?
 

aqua_duck

Coach
Messages
18,643
blackfriday said:
phil waugh did what was required of him - he targeted mccaw enough for it to unnerve henry after the game.
WHat you mean a swinging arm to the head of a bloke not in posession of the football, he's lucky the SANZAR judiciary is a joke, he wouldn't copped 8-10 weeks in the NRL, grade 5 striking
 

skeepe

Immortal
Messages
48,339
Iafeta said:
Even Jake White thought the Aussies were over the top.

Jake "My guys knee blokes to the head and rip eyeballs" White FFS!

What say you skeepe? Still ripped off, biatch?

We were ripped off by Phil Waugh and a dodgy try from a forward pass. Phil Waugh is an idiot. I hate Phil Waugh. He is an untalented thug. I thought we went through this already?
 

SpaceMonkey

Immortal
Messages
40,768
skeepe said:
We were ripped off by Phil Waugh and a dodgy try from a forward pass. Phil Waugh is an idiot. I hate Phil Waugh. He is an untalented thug. I thought we went through this already?

I think Elsom's dodgy try from a knock-on evens out the forward pass call.
 

Iafeta

Referee
Messages
24,357
Yeah, that try was dodgy with a capital D.

Even Georgie thought it was a "surprising" call.
 

Thomas

First Grade
Messages
9,658
Iafeta said:
Their second half was dismal Thomas.

I still maintain the All Blacks are playing well below their best. If the All Blacks were in their 2005 form, they'd have put 30 on the Wallabies in the second half alone.

Sure the Wallabies played badly in the second half...but why?

Because the AB's took it up a gear and they were unable to follow them.

I stand by my call that had the Wallabies been playing any other country they would have won that test easily. The pressure the Ab's put on them and the patience they showed (reminded me of the Wallaby teams from 1998-2001) forced the Aussies to make mistakes.
 

bayrep

Juniors
Messages
2,112
Considering the Wallabies are ranked 4th? from mem thats a big claim. I dont see the Wallabies winning in SA.
 

Thomas

First Grade
Messages
9,658
bayrep said:
Considering the Wallabies are ranked 4th? from mem thats a big claim. I dont see the Wallabies winning in SA.

Yeah...but I don't see NZ winning in SA either....

I have this feeling that the Boks are planning an ambush. They are a completely different team at home...and with wholesale changes in the NZ team...there could be an upset on the cards.

And Wallabies ranked 4th? I would have thought 3rd...with NZ and France in the front. The only team Australia has lost to this year has been NZ.
 

Thomas

First Grade
Messages
9,658
The moon is made of cheese.

How woeful were SA????

I thought "Here we go" after watching the first 20 minutes. I thought the SA of old had come back......but when NZ soaked up their initial onslaught they had nothing.
 

tye

Juniors
Messages
1,959
The Kiwi's & boks have been targeting Larkam for years. It's about time they started to give a bit back. They should play with that sort of mongrel every week.
 

Latest posts

Top