I already have earlier in the thread.........
Let's see you agreed with Hazem despite the fact if he couldn't kick goals he wouldn't be in anyone's list. It would be the equivalent of saying Luke Burt was better.
Ettingshausen was a centre.
Matt Sing was a centre for a major part of his career. Great player but was as much a centre as anything else.
Steve Morris played a major part of his career at halfback.
Folau was around for 5 seconds and didn't offer much apart from catching bombs.
My point is you rag on and crap on about how bad a defender he was. Then explain how all the great players who played against Offiah never exposed him. You are saying these guys couldn't expose weaknesses ?
If Offiah couldn't defend he would never of been chosen 30+ times in international football. Australia would of racked up 50+ every time they played them.
first it was he only scored 10 tries because English players can't tackle even though he once managed 4 tries in 15 minutes against Brisbane once. I guess that Brisbane side of that era must of been well sh*t. He scored 20 tries in 26 games in Rugby League here. Basically it combines to a season and he scored 20 tries.
It's really ridiculous that a guy can dominate in every level of the game yet. You rate him less then guys like El Masri. 3rd leading tryscorer of all time by the way.
Basically what you are saying is a shocking defender can play 30 times for his country. Play against some of the greatest players of all time and not get constantly exposed ? what does this say for the likes of Langer and Stuart and Sterling ?