It was a sh#t show of a tour from the beginning, middle and end. The performance and results of GB are secondary.I wonder how much different this thread and thoughts on this tour would be if GB had actually won all their games. The vibe seems to be call them England and they'd play harder and win.
It’s not just the name of the team. The whole tour was poorly arranged. We had a couple of months notice before the confirmation of any hard facts about venues and dates. This left little time for many interested supporters to, literally, get on board. The selection of three Australian players didn’t sit well with a lot of people. WB using this squad to push a wholly England agenda. I wonder if he selected Coote on his NRL experience rather than realising he plays for Scotland? The whole thing has come across as an afterthought and IMO the players have responded in kind. Having said all that this looks like an ageing team whose best days are behind them.I wonder how much different this thread and thoughts on this tour would be if GB had actually won all their games. The vibe seems to be call them England and they'd play harder and win.
The GB concept was made redundant in 1995 when rugby union went professional and the need for talented welsh Union players to cross the divide in order to make decent money ended.The reason the Great Britain concept was turfed out years ago was to make each UK country stronger individually. I thought it was a concept essentially deemed 'never to return', so I was surprised when they announced the GB tour. And I think it should be shelved again.
The GB team is pretty much England. I don't think they magically lose all motivation because they're playing for Britain and not England.
Sorry he’s English - Gareth Obrien?
Lol. I doubt that is true. Being on the BBC doesn't help, would be better if we were on Channel 5, could have taken the Kiwi commentary which was better, don't like D Woods, well don't like almost all English commentators, well don't like most commentators where ever they live.I wonder how much different this thread and thoughts on this tour would be if GB had actually won all their games. The vibe seems to be call them England and they'd play harder and win.
As an Aussie i'm not too fussed if it's GB or England, however you can make a decent argument for Great Britain despite the shambles of a tour.
Often the argument is brought up that it is simply England in a different shirt, however that may not be the case over the next few seasons and imo shouldn't have been this year.
Morgan Knowles and Regan Grace are 23 and 22 with multiple tests for Wales. Knowles almost certainty would have been picked for Great Britain if not for injury and imo Grace should have been. If their career trajectory continues they could easily be in the top 17 for Great Britain as early as next season.
Wales last 4 Home Tests have been played in front of crowds of 1257, 902, 1028 and 1253. There is nothing wrong with that for an emerging nation standard. However for 2 elite players in Regan and Morgan that is poor compared to test matches a Great Britain team would be involved in (both crowds and stature).
On top of that, performance wise Wales is also struggling to match the more elite teams. Again, nothing wrong for an emerging nation, however elite players want to play with other elite players. In 2017 WC, Wales were smashed 50 to 6 against PNG and 72 to 6 against Fiji. You can imagine the kind of score line they would be hit with against the likes of Australia or England.
Fast forward to the end of the season and Australia are about to play an Ashes Series against England. Morgan Knowles can choose between being a part of a sold out Ashes Series or a low key test in front of 2000 at most. Morgan will play for England (as he has every right to do) and Wales will lose him. Regan Grace who is Welsh born has a similar choice, I have no doubt Regan qualifies for England via residency or some type of grandparent. Either Regan plays for Wales in front of 2000 or in a high profile Ashes series. So Wales lose both players to a rival country, or worse they go to Union.
If it's Great Britain they can both play in high profile games without needing to change their country. They can play as Wales in WC or even if it's just Great Britain all the time at least they can represent Wales as part of GB.
Not sure if you are aware but GB have never played a home game outside of England. That speaks volumes to me.
Rugby League in Wales is not attractive to players at the moment. The opportunity to play in big games for Great Britain makes it more attractive to players both emerging and senior. Wales can still play games at an emerging level with the Serbia's and Italy's same as England Knights. However the elite players from Wales have an opportunity to play for Great Britain. I also see no reason why an Ashes test for GB can't be taken to Millennium Stadium, just like the 2013 WC that attracted 40,000.
For England - they needed younger players no matter if they won or lost. McGillvary and Hall are most likely done, they could both probably still do the job but Makinson, Johnstone and Handley look better choices. Lomax to me seems like England's best half. Haven't seen young Trueman play yet but is he good enough to be a regular international 7? Widdop has always been average in the halves for England but went quite good at 1. Has Jack Walker come along any good?
Graham will be Graham as long as he plays. Thompson looks good. Stevie Ward and Ben Currie should add a bit. Leeds had a young player Cameron Smith up and coming last I looked, has he gone any good lately?
sorry thought he meant Toronto players who have played for Scotland.Alex Walker is the Scotland full back; he played for London last year.
Tier 1 England rest Tier 2 so they should be able to switch and switch back around next yearAs an Aussie i'm not too fussed if it's GB or England, however you can make a decent argument for Great Britain despite the shambles of a tour.
Often the argument is brought up that it is simply England in a different shirt, however that may not be the case over the next few seasons and imo shouldn't have been this year.
Morgan Knowles and Regan Grace are 23 and 22 with multiple tests for Wales. Knowles almost certainty would have been picked for Great Britain if not for injury and imo Grace should have been. If their career trajectory continues they could easily be in the top 17 for Great Britain as early as next season.
Wales last 4 Home Tests have been played in front of crowds of 1257, 902, 1028 and 1253. There is nothing wrong with that for an emerging nation standard. However for 2 elite players in Regan and Morgan that is poor compared to test matches a Great Britain team would be involved in (both crowds and stature).
On top of that, performance wise Wales is also struggling to match the more elite teams. Again, nothing wrong for an emerging nation, however elite players want to play with other elite players. In 2017 WC, Wales were smashed 50 to 6 against PNG and 72 to 6 against Fiji. You can imagine the kind of score line they would be hit with against the likes of Australia or England.
Fast forward to the end of the season and Australia are about to play an Ashes Series against England. Morgan Knowles can choose between being a part of a sold out Ashes Series or a low key test in front of 2000 at most. Morgan will play for England (as he has every right to do) and Wales will lose him. Regan Grace who is Welsh born has a similar choice, I have no doubt Regan qualifies for England via residency or some type of grandparent. Either Regan plays for Wales in front of 2000 or in a high profile Ashes series. So Wales lose both players to a rival country, or worse they go to Union.
If it's Great Britain they can both play in high profile games without needing to change their country. They can play as Wales in WC or even if it's just Great Britain all the time at least they can represent Wales as part of GB.
Rugby League in Wales is not attractive to players at the moment. The opportunity to play in big games for Great Britain makes it more attractive to players both emerging and senior. Wales can still play games at an emerging level with the Serbia's and Italy's same as England Knights. However the elite players from Wales have an opportunity to play for Great Britain. I also see no reason why an Ashes test for GB can't be taken to Millennium Stadium, just like the 2013 WC that attracted 40,000.