What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

.I want Wayne Bennett, reveals Nathan Tinkler

Nuffy

Bench
Messages
4,075
This isn't over by a long shot, yesterday was shown to be purely a negotiating tactic and a pretty blunt one............




JUST hours after withdrawing his offer to buy the Newcastle Knights, mining magnate Nathan Tinkler issued a highly charged message to Knights fans that indicated his fight for the club is a long way from over.
In an explosive interview with The Daily Telegraph, Tinkler admitted for the first time he did call Cronulla's Kade Snowden last week and that he advised the former Newcastle Knights junior not to sign a contract until the end of the season.

Tinkler also confirmed his interest in Bulldogs sensation Jamal Idris - and backed himself as the man who could lure supercoach Wayne Bennett to the Knights.


"I think I could be very persuasive with him [Bennett]," Tinkler said.

On Idris, he said: "Show me a coach who doesn't want Idris and I will show you a liar."The Knights are in crisis with members last night gathering at a Newcastle pub - furious that the club's dithering has chased Tinkler's money away.


***
SOME people have suggested Newcastle chairman Robbie Tew and CEO Steve Burraston are simply trying to save their own necks rather than do what's best for the Knights. How do you see it?
They are playing real-life fantasy league. They do not keep their board informed and they are the only two people who make decisions at the club. It is not a community club. I was proposing this transaction for the benefit of the Newcastle community. We are involved in a range of other community projects with groups who are keen to work with us and we will devote our attention towards them in future.
Have you given up on taking over the Knights? Will you ever walk away from the club?

My offer has been rejected. I have not walked away but the Knights' proposal is not capable of acceptance. There are plenty of other charities and sporting groups that appreciate our support and will benefit from this. We look forward to working with them.

Is it now up to the members to get rid of the board?

That is not my call.

You said previously you could not understand how a city that exports 40 per cent of the state's wealth still struggles to finance a footy team. You said it was incomprehensible, not exactly a ringing endorsement for the current management structure. Can you comprehend the negative campaign Tew and Burraston appear to have mounted against your takeover bid?


It has been disappointing but the Knights have a long tradition of not being able to help themselves. I believe the community deserves better.

Are you sick of dealing with them?

They appear to be solely focused on disaster scenarios. I am surprised they dare go outside.

What has been the most frustrating aspect for you during this whole process?

The lack of commercial awareness and the poor advice the Knights are being given. This transaction has proven to be beyond them and their legal advisers as we have seen from their statements.

Do you feel there have been deliberate hurdles to block your deal?

Messrs Tew and Burraston appear to be the only ones involved in any decision-making process. Everyone else is in the dark. I am certain they knew their proposed changes to our offer of assistance were not capable of being accepted. This scenario has gone to plan for them.

Do you think their constant questions are in the best interests of the club?

I believe our offer would be accepted by nearly any other NRL club. It was an offer that I wanted the community and members to see as very good value and guaranteeing the future and success of the club for the region. My mistake was probably not guaranteeing Tew's and Burraston's future involvement at the club.

Why do you want to be involved in the Knights?

The Knights are a massive part of the fabric of Newcastle. I believe the community deserves to have a strong competitive club that is well managed and capable of winning premierships - not struggling to survive with the aim of making the semi-finals. To play for the Knights and be involved with the club should be considered a privilege. I think you only get that from developing junior talent and this management has not given our community much to cheer about, on or off the paddock.
What do you say to claims you haven't been open and honest in the offer you have made to the members?

I am very comfortable with the conduct of myself and my team. The best interests of the Newcastle community have always been at the top of our agenda. Clearly, offering to underwrite club sponsorship, develop junior talent and ploughing all profits from the club back into its junior development is not good enough for these guys.

Would you back yourself to turn the Knights into an NRL super club if you were given the green light?


Absolutely. The Knights need to rid themselves of their cannibalistic culture of infighting and struggling. It's not a happy club and that culture needs to be reinvigorated. There is a reason we can't attract talent to the club under its current management.

Kade Snowden. Did you ring him last week to talk about returning to Newcastle? Have you spoken to him at all?


Yes I did. I didn't tell anyone. I don't need permission to use a phone and local talent should always be first priority. I believe he will be the best prop in the game for the next five years, and as a local talent he belongs in Newcastle. Kade would sweat for the blue and red like Chief, Sarge, Butts and other great front-rowers for the Knights. I don't believe kids grow up aspiring to play outside their local NRL team, so he should return home and play for the Knights.
Was an offer ever made on your behalf?

No. I just asked, what's the hurry? I didn't realise he was being pushed to sign a new deal and had no clue the Knights had walked away from signing him. Kade should wait till the end of the year. His price is only going up.

Would you like to see him back at Newcastle?


All Knights supporters should. It would scare all clubs for us to get Kade back because it would give us an enforcer again. We haven't had one since Craig Smith retired but we can produce one. The Chief, Sarge, Butts were all great hard men for Newcastle who the community still honour today. Kade is of that ilk and can be that for Newcastle for the next five to six years.

Is your vision to have as many home-grown players back playing for the Knights?


Absolutely. Name me the last local player to come through the Newcastle competition or Group 19, Group 21 or Group 3? We even let talent like Inglis, Idris and co escape. We have established a strong culture of beating ourselves when it comes to developing talent. Andrew Johns playing reserve grade straight out of school might have been pushed out of the club under this management. Kade Snowden was playing front row in first-grade at 19 and they still couldn't keep him? One of the only guys to move on, why? Because he could attract another club. The Knights get left with the rest and that's why we struggle.

Can you understand why Newcastle's current board would want it any other way?

Winning is a culture - you either have it or you don't. They don't.

What about Jamal Idris. Would you like to see him in Knights colours?


Show me an NRL coach that doesn't want Idris and I will show you a liar.

There has also been speculation you'd like Wayne Bennett on board. True or false?

Who wouldn't? Any coach needs cattle and I would not be confident Wayne would take this squad on. He is a master coach and a master at identifying talent. You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear though and while coaching the likes of Kurt Gidley must be appealing to him, I am not sure he would be attracted to the current roster. Why take that on when you are a legend of the game whose legacy will be talked about for generations and you have your pick of nearly any club in the competition? Having said that, I think I could be very persuasive with him!

I read recently that Russell Crowe had actually advised you against trying to get involved with an NRL club. Do you wish you had taken his advice?

His advice to not get involved was personal but, like Russell, my offer was an act of community and about giving something back. Russell and his management team have made a really positive difference to that club and that community and they should be congratulated. They don't have a premiership yet but they are already winning.

Would you like to meet face to face with the fans and the members to explain your proposal?

I have met with many already. Unfortunately, members can't accept the offer unless it is proposed by the board. I think we have wasted enough time. I think the whole thing is very unfortunate. Let's get on with running 10th! Looking forward to the season.
How do you respond to claims by Tew that your final offer to buy the club was a "pale imitation" of the $100 million bid initially proposed last month? Tew also claimed you had moved the goalposts before withdrawing the offer to buy out the club.

The Tinkler Group has responded to the claims of Newcastle Knights chairman Rob Tew. We stand by the $10 million per year commitment in sponsorship and corporate hospitality guaranteed over 10 years to the club as presented last month. There have been no material variations to the offer and it is now clear that Mr Tew did not understand the original offer. As we presented to the board, TSG was prepared to underwrite the difference between the annual sponsorship of the club each year and the $10 million each year. Our offer and guarantee make no mention of membership or ticketing revenue. It is unfortunate Mr Tew has sought to misrepresent our offer and indicates he is not interested or capable of determining the value of our proposed commitment.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...s-nathan-tinkler/story-e6frexnr-1226009709075
 

sneaky_is_here

Juniors
Messages
1,606
$100m deal to good to be true, say Newcastle Knights

THE future of the Newcastle Knights could rest with club members after billionaire Nathan Tinkler walked away yesterday from his $100 million offer to buy the club.
In a day of high drama for the Knights, a planned meeting between Tinkler and Newcastle Knights officials was called off after the mining magnate decided not to go ahead with the deal.

The Knights immediately announced they were moving forward without Tinkler's financial support.

The club and Tinkler have been at loggerheads over the finer points of the deal for some weeks.

Tinkler had wanted his offer to go to a meeting of members but Knights officials refused to endorse the latest deal, claiming it was a "watered down" version of the original offer. "The much-talked about $100 million offer turned out to be a mirage," Knights chairman Rob Tew said yesterday.

Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.

Tinkler takeover



But while the Tinkler deal is officially off the table, there were suggestions yesterday his involvement with the club may not be over.

He put the blame for his decision to withdraw firmly at the feet of current Knights directors.

Reading between the lines, Tinkler indicated he may be prepared to renegotiate if Knights members demanded a meeting and the current board was overthrown. "The goal-posts have not moved and I think the greatest problem you have is that you are poorly advised," Tinkler said in an email to the directors.

In a swipe at Tew and Knights chief executive Steve Burraston, Tinkler signed off his email with "Tew and Burro rejoice, you keep YOUR club" .

The Knights acted quickly to try to limit any potential damage from the fallout of Tinkler's decision to withdraw his offer.

Burraston denied suggestions the club was financially on its knees and headed for oblivion without Tinkler's support, predicting they would return an operating profit for the second consecutive year.

The club also announced they had recruited three wealthy businessmen to form a Patrons Trust which has agreed to put up a minimum of $6 million over the next four years.

That guarantee was reached with the businessmen at a hastily arranged meeting yesterday after Tinkler's offer was withdrawn. While it was trumpeted as a viable alternative to Tinker's offer, there is a catch.

The Patrons Trust money is not a hand-out. It has to be paid back at the end of the term.

"The money is there if and when we need it," Tew said.

"But yes, at this stage, whatever we use would need to be paid back."

The Knights have called a members meeting on Monday to outline the club's position and its future.

Tew made no apologies for the way the club has handled the whole privatisation affair.

Both he and Burraston slammed suggestions their actions and those of the board were simply to protect their own positions.

"The reality is a number of key elements in the proposal have been withdrawn over the past few weeks to the point where the offer we were left with was a pale imitation of the original offer," Tew said. "The much-talked about $100 million offer turned out to be a mirage.

"The real value of the offer ultimately put on the table is a year by year commitment of between 0 and $10 million paid over 10 years with a maximum guarantee of two years."

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...ewcastle-knights/story-e6frexnr-1226009712575
 

Yosh

Coach
Messages
12,589
I must admit Tinks has me hooked! Might all be political lies but I don't care ahahaha!
 

Karmawave

Bench
Messages
4,950
The thing that most concerns me about the article is the comments on Burraston and Tew in reality being a 2 man show in the running of the Knights.

This perception has been the case in many circles for quite some time well before the issues with Tinkler, and its not a good look that fuels the anti Knights sentiment that is currently around.

If the board has little or no input, why have one.

If the fans input doesn't really matter , why have them at all?

Let's say hypothetically that the fans pro Tinkler or pro Burro/Tew are split dead down the middle 50/50.

Can the Knights afford to alienate 50% of their fan base and potentially lose them?

If the patrons model goes ahead, this is the risk. Nothing changes in the business model currently used, its just flush with more funds. The Knights going down this path have a lot more to lose than if the split was 50/50 and Tinkler took over.

Because Tinkler will only need to pull out one massive coup outta his rather large buttocks, like sign a supercoach or superstar, and the any fans alienated will love him again.

I severely doubt that Burro/Tew will get that same opportunity to win back any lost fans, because frankly, I cannot see players wanting to come here from other clubs while ever the same business model continues to exist.

We'll remain the outcasts of the free agent market - even if we do have the money to spend, because lets face it, we've been knocked back before by good players when we've outbid other teams...

What will change? Not much.
 

Elephant Hunter

Juniors
Messages
185
To be honest after reading this 'interview' with Tinkler I hope to hell he does not get hold of the club.

He is very rude and degrades the current roster of players, if he gets ownership how many of the current squad are going to want to play for him. The only person he seems to rate in the team is Gidley.

I don't know if he is going to be able to replace the other 24+ men including some genuine stars after he takes over.

Does he really think Uate, De Gois, Mullen, Sa'u, Costigan, Housten and whoever else you may feel is a quality player will fell good about this kind of talk. Are they going to want to sweat and bleed for this guy.

I wouldn't after that interview and those comments about the roster
 

aqua_duck

Coach
Messages
18,771
He didnt say it with alot of grace but what he said is essentially true. We cant settle for finishing just outaside the 8 or even just inside, we sould be striving higher regardless of who runs the club
 

Rolla

Juniors
Messages
2,196
The truth is B-Dos that these are the players we have this season and we will have a very competitive side.

Hearing in the media that tinkler will look to replace and upgrade the poor current roster would not do the players any good.

No doubt there is room for improvement in the side but that is no reason to put down the guys that are there.
 

slotmachine

First Grade
Messages
7,708
Our current squad is in the bottom 50% of the NRL in terms of quality, if not bottom 25%.

Tinker may be arrogant, but that doesn't make him wrong.
 

Mr48Volts

Juniors
Messages
145
The truth is B-Dos that these are the players we have this season and we will have a very competitive side.

Hearing in the media that tinkler will look to replace and upgrade the poor current roster would not do the players any good.

No doubt there is room for improvement in the side but that is no reason to put down the guys that are there.

I haven't read or heard Tinkler bag any current players, and the ones he's going after are all ex Jnr's of our club, Newcastle has always had a great tradition of blooding young local players and sticking by them, something we've lost sight of over the last few years, and that's not to say some inports we bought along they way were not good for the club

If Tinkler does get control and gets these guys back inc Idris, TLL and Snowden, based on current form that can only be good for us.

As for the current crop he hasn't bagged anybody, but maybe this will put a rocket up some of our guys who we know can be better and play more consistently, surely that's gotta be a good thing?
 

Rolla

Juniors
Messages
2,196
I haven't read or heard Tinkler bag any current players, and the ones he's going after are all ex Jnr's of our club, Newcastle has always had a great tradition of blooding young local players and sticking by them, something we've lost sight of over the last few years, and that's not to say some inports we bought along they way were not good for the club

If Tinkler does get control and gets these guys back inc Idris, TLL and Snowden, based on current form that can only be good for us.

As for the current crop he hasn't bagged anybody, but maybe this will put a rocket up some of our guys who we know can be better and play more consistently, surely that's gotta be a good thing?

Good point, and hopefully this is the case.

I'm not saying i disagree with what tinkler is saying, however i don't know that continually criticising our squad is necessary or helpful.

You are right he hasn't named and shamed players but he has implied enough by saying our players arent good enough etc.
 

B-dos

Referee
Messages
28,165
lol.

what are you on about gene?

tinkler tells it how it is. does that upset you?
 

Gene Krupa

Referee
Messages
20,216
Tinkler tells it how he wants it to be, not how it is. You really don't get the vested interest thing, do you?
 
Messages
16,034
The truth is B-Dos that these are the players we have this season and we will have a very competitive side.

Hearing in the media that tinkler will look to replace and upgrade the poor current roster would not do the players any good.

No doubt there is room for improvement in the side but that is no reason to put down the guys that are there.

Can we match the Dragons, Roosters, Tigers and Titans @ their best while were @ our best, I sincerely dont believe that we can.

We can give them a run for the money but even the diehards on here if being completely honest can admit that we dont have a top tier roster.
 

Rolla

Juniors
Messages
2,196
Can we match the Dragons, Roosters, Tigers and Titans @ their best while were @ our best, I sincerely dont believe that we can.

We can give them a run for the money but even the diehards on here if being completely honest can admit that we dont have a top tier roster.

Don't get me wrong i'm not suggesting we have the best team in the comp. I think at our best we can match anybody, we have shown this, however i can't see us having the consistancy required to be one of the top sides.

My point isn't that we are a top four side but tinkler publicly writing us off is unhealthy for the squad, given that he is potentially their future employer. I believe he is using it as a tool to push himself and his agenda... I don't think it is the best way to go about things.
 

Latest posts

Top