absolutely pathetic batting from Head there.
Why expose a #11 batsmen with 3 overs to go? When you've only got 1 wicket in hand, the dominant batsman has to take most of the strike and shield the tail-ender.
9/277 off 50 overs.
Australia have fallen at least 40 runs short of what they should've got.
It is still too high of a risk exposing a #11 batsman with 3 overs to go, especially after the batting collapse from the 5th wicket onwards.You need every run you can get at this stage. Haze is no bunny. Good batting Head.
5/15Pitch looks a little tacky at times, 300 is probably par IMO. So 277 is defendable if we bowl really well.
We are bloody good for a collapse though, aren't we?
His ODI career stats haven't been that impressive.Henriques is f**king useless
5/15
Not necessarily relevant to the collapse but I much prefer Head at the top, no Finch, Lynn or a batsman at four and Maxwell 5 with the all rounder at 6. Henriques is too high at four.
Honestly if I was picking the side Maxwell would bat lower even. He's too irresponsible for the middle order. But with the squad we have it's not really possible.
His ODI career stats haven't been that impressive.
In the 10 ODIs he's played before this match, only a highest score of 18 (average of 8) and bowling average of 42.85