firstly why does this have to affect the corporate sponsors at all??
the laws of geometry would prevail - it would inhibit view
it can go above them and Im sure of all people they hate the sun in their eyes more than anyone.
i agree - but its not as though we receive many sunday afternoon games
I dont understand why you're laughing at the 68k? over estimated?
you estimated the ROI over 2 seasons - being $68k from extra bums on dry seats in the peter burns
lets do the analysis on corporates not being inside due to losing the the view
seating in excesss of 200 corporates inside at, lets assume $150 per head per game (possibly under valued for beverage, food and first class view)
the math on that one over 2 seasons slightly out does the $68k
Have you seen that PB stand at night when its raining and no one sits in there. Then compare it to the upper et when its raining.
yes - and no one stands on family hill in the rain, no one stands on Peach hill in the rain, no one sits in the southern grand stand when it rains. heck, no one sits in the southern grand stand when its dry
they face larger issues than an extra 250 dry bums on seats
and if they really did care about the minority numbers then they may have executed a different apporach year prior when they sh*t on all the season seat holders on the eastern concourse