If ya can't beat 'em....?

[Eelementary]

the dux

I have mentioned this very point before too, but in another thread.

Let's take a look at last year's and this year's teams: (I mean our best 13 when fit nd in form at the time)

2002

1. Hodgson (NSW)
2. Burt (City/Country)
3. Lyon (NSW, AUS)
4. Vaeliki (NZ)
5. Moodie (NSW)
6. Dykes (Dally M 5/8 of Year 2001)
7. McFadden
8. Cayless (C) (NZ)
9. Drew
10. Vella (AUS, NSW)
11. Hindmarsh (AUS, NSW)
12. Hindmarsh
13. Wagon (QLD)


2003:

1. Hodgson
2. Burt
3. Lyon
4. Vaeliki
5. Moodie
6. Dykes
7. Green (QLD)
8. Cayless
9. Morris (City/Country)
10. Vella
11. Hindy
12. Hopkins
13. Wagon

In many instances, when the players are fit and in form, we have a team of "best player in that position" or "excellent player in that position".

Yet we get where?

 

[Y2Eel]

"Worst thread ever" how can you ever condone cheating to win?
Anyone who thinks we have to stoop to the 2002 bulldogs level is a moron or any cheating at that :evil: makes you wonder what the game has come down to when people are saying that we have to cheat to win...

 

[eloquentEEL]

cheating is bad. mkay.