crocodile
Bench
- Messages
- 3,551
Whoever he wants.With Bill Gates it's not so much his money, it's his company. Who should inherit it from him?
Whoever he wants.With Bill Gates it's not so much his money, it's his company. Who should inherit it from him?
What a load of horseshit. The top 10% of income earners pay 50% of the taxes in this joint.
What a load of horseshit. The top 10% of income earners pay 50% of the taxes in this joint.
Corporations don't pay tax on their income. They pay tax on their profits. Not quite the same thing. They may well pay no corporate tax for years because they either didn't make a profit or they are carrying forward previous years' losses.There is a vast difference between income, declared income and taxable income.
The top income earners are Corporations. Many of them pay no tax for years.
As for salaried incomes, there are so many tax structures that assist in avoidance that top income earners pay a fraction of what they should.
Family Trust structures. Negative gearing etc.
Income and wealth are not the same thing. We tax income here, not wealth.Btw, I was referring to the top 1%
The Super rich who hold the vast majority of the wealth in the Country
The top 10% may well pay 50% of all taxes, but the top 1% hold 90% of all wealth. Its that Spacemonkey referred to.
If the Super wealthy paid in what they should during life there would be no need to tax at death
It's his money. He can do with it what he wishes.Bill gates has said many times that he is giving his kids "only" 10 mill each. And will give away the rest.
Hes really turned around from when he was a ruthless greedy merkin in the 90s.
Income and wealth are not the same thing. We tax income here, not wealth.
There is no need to tax at death.
Corporations don't pay tax on their income. They pay tax on their profits. Not quite the same thing. They may well pay no corporate tax for years because they either didn't make a profit or they are carrying forward previous years' losses.
Negative gearing does not reduce the tax collected by the government. It only changes the date when it is collected.
No shitIt's his money. He can do with it what he wishes.
Who says we're not taxing income fairly.I understand wealth and income are not the same. But not taxing income fairly means wealth accumulates unfairly. That's my point. We need to tax more fairly.
I agree, there is absolutely no need to tax upon death. I am vehemently opposed to it for many reasons.
The comparison with Qatar is not useful. Their gas companies are owned by the state so of course they receive all the revenue. That doesn't mean they earn $40 billion. Revenue isn't profit and their extraction and distribution costs have to be covered. Conversely, Chevron and partners invested $50 billion in the Gorgon gas project which ultimately has to be repaid with interest. Obviously, profits will have to wait. The WA government still receives the royalty payments regardless of profit though.I understand Corporations only pay tax on profits
The problem is that we allow too many reasons for them to demonstrate why they're not making any profits when in fact they are. The system is broken
Australia is the largest source of LPG in the World. We collect less than $1 billion in revenue from it per annum.
Qatar is the second biggest. They collect close to $40 billion per annum
Work that out over a decade and tell me we have things right
That lost revenue is repeated across all our mining industries. We allow foreign corporations to dig up the resources that belong to all of us. They pay us nothing for them. They sell them overseas and make a f**king fortune off them. They pay no tax. Chevron hasn't paid a cent in a decade.
We are a resource rich Nation with a tiny population . Taxes should be next to nothing here. We should live in functioning Cities with free public transport. We should be the envy of the World
Instead we give our future away to a tiny portion of super rich people so they can get richer at our expense
Meanwhile we piss ourselves worrying that a few dark skinned people might come here without an invitation.
We're f**king mad
Who says we're not taxing income fairly.
The comparison with Qatar is not useful. Their gas companies are owned by the state so of course they receive all the revenue. That doesn't mean they earn $40 billion. Revenue isn't profit and their extraction and distribution costs have to be covered. Conversely, Chevron and partners invested $50 billion in the Gorgon gas project which ultimately has to be repaid with interest. Obviously, profits will have to wait. The WA government still receives the royalty payments regardless of profit though.
Gittins has no economic qualifications whatsoever. He is not an economist.Many economists
Start with Ross Gittins
Last time I looked, the WA government sets the price.I understand that they invest
But do they invest in infrastructures that benefit Australia or infrastructures that benefit Chevron?
If we weren't quite so generous would they still want our resources? Short answer, yes they would
I am not anti business- but this shit us symbiotic . If they want what we have, they need to pay a fair price
Profit traffic is way too one way
I reckon his kids will be happy with that... provided that they get a good share in Microsoft.Bill gates has said many times that he is giving his kids "only" 10 mill each. And will give away the rest.
Hes really turned around from when he was a ruthless greedy merkin in the 90s.
Gittins has no economic qualifications whatsoever. He is not an economist.
Gittins has no economic qualifications whatsoever. He is not an economist.
No. His major is in accounting.Hes got a commerce degree, no doubt with a major in economics